ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
The Hamiltonian Brain: Efficient Probabilistic Inference with Excitatory-Inhibitory Neural Circuit Dynamics.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combining sampling and attractor dynamics in spiking models of head direction systems.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Relating natural image statistics to patterns of response covariability in macaque primary visual cortex.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Conscious active inference I: A quantum model naturally implements the path integral needed for real-time planning and control.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Learning probability distributions of sensory inputs with Monte Carlo predictive coding.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Joint modeling of choices and reaction times based on Bayesian contextual behavioral control.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Chaotic neural dynamics facilitate probabilistic computations through sampling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Decentralized Neural Circuits of Multisensory Information Integration in the Brain.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Bayesian encoding and decoding as distinct perspectives on neural coding.Nature neuroscience · 2023Review
- Sampling-based Bayesian inference in recurrent circuits of stochastic spiking neurons.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Depersonalization disorder as a systematic downregulation of interoceptive signals.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Fractional neural sampling as a theory of spatiotemporal probabilistic computations in neural circuits.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Cortical oscillations support sampling-based computations in spiking neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Task-induced neural covariability as a signature of approximate Bayesian learning and inference.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Bridging physiological and perceptual views of autism by means of sampling-based Bayesian inference.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022Article
- Natural gradient enables fast sampling in spiking neural networks.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2022Article
- Synaptic plasticity as Bayesian inference.Nature neuroscience · 2021Article
- Learning probabilistic neural representations with randomly connected circuits.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.Psychological review · 2020Article
- Cortical-like dynamics in recurrent circuits optimized for sampling-based probabilistic inference.Nature neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Probabilistic inference offers a principled framework for understanding both behaviour and cortical computation. However, two basic and ubiquitous properties of cortical responses seem difficult to reconcile with probabilistic inference: neural activity displays prominent oscillations in response to constant input, and large transient changes in response to stimulus onset. Indeed, cortical models of probabilistic inference have typically either concentrated on tuning curve or receptive field properties and remained agnostic as to the underlying circuit dynamics, or had simplistic dynamics that gave neither oscillations nor transients. Here we show that these dynamical behaviours may in fact be understood as hallmarks of the specific representation and algorithm that the cortex employs to perform probabilistic inference. We demonstrate that a particular family of probabilistic inference algorithms, Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC), naturally maps onto the dynamics of excitatory-inhibitory neural networks. Specifically, we constructed a model of an excitatory-inhibitory circuit in primary visual cortex that performed HMC inference, and thus inherently gave rise to oscillations and transients. These oscillations were not mere epiphenomena but served an important functional role: speeding up inference by rapidly spanning a large volume of state space. Inference thus became an order of magnitude more efficient than in a non-oscillatory variant of the model. In addition, the network matched two specific properties of observed neural dynamics that would otherwise be difficult to account for using probabilistic inference. First, the frequency of oscillations as well as the magnitude of transients increased with the contrast of the image stimulus. Second, excitation and inhibition were balanced, and inhibition lagged excitation. These results suggest a new functional role for the separation of cortical populations into excitatory and inhibitory neurons, and for the neural oscillations that emerge in such excitatory-inhibitory networks: enhancing the efficiency of cortical computations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.