Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28027290›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2016

Single-Cell-Based Analysis Highlights a Surge in Cell-to-Cell Molecular Variability Preceding Irreversible Commitment in a Differentiation Process.

Angélique Richard, Loïs Boullu, Ulysse Herbach, Arnaud Bonnafoux, Valérie Morin, Elodie Vallin, Anissa Guillemin, Nan Papili Gao, Rudiyanto Gunawan, Jérémie Cosette and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Identification of dynamic network biomarkerMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Angélique RichardUniv Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Laboratory of Biology and Modelling of the Cell, 46 allée d'Italie Site Jacques Monod, F-69007, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5440-8656
Loïs BoulluInria Team Dracula, Inria Center Grenoble Rhône-Alpes, France.
Ulysse HerbachUniv Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Laboratory of Biology and Modelling of the Cell, 46 allée d'Italie Site Jacques Monod, F-69007, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0972-385X
Arnaud BonnafouxUniv Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Laboratory of Biology and Modelling of the Cell, 46 allée d'Italie Site Jacques Monod, F-69007, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0472-0761
Valérie MorinUniv Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5310 - INSERM U1217, Institut NeuroMyoGène, F-69622 Villeurbanne-Cedex, France.
Elodie VallinUniv Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Laboratory of Biology and Modelling of the Cell, 46 allée d'Italie Site Jacques Monod, F-69007, Lyon, France.
Anissa GuilleminUniv Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Laboratory of Biology and Modelling of the Cell, 46 allée d'Italie Site Jacques Monod, F-69007, Lyon, France.
Nan Papili GaoInstitute for Chemical and Bioengineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rudiyanto GunawanInstitute for Chemical and Bioengineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6480-7976
Jérémie CosetteGenethon - Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale - INSERM, Université d'Evry-Val-d'Essone - 1 rue de l'internationale 91000 Evry, France.
Ophélie ArnaudRIKEN - Center for Life Science Technologies (Division of Genomic Technologies)-CLST (DGT), 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045, Japan.
Jean-Jacques KupiecINSERM, Centre Cavaillès, Ecole Normale Supérieure, F-75005 Paris, France.
Thibault EspinasseUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS UMR 5208, Institut Camille Jordan 43 blvd du 11 novembre 1918, F-69622 Villeurbanne-Cedex, France.
Sandrine Gonin-GiraudUniv Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Laboratory of Biology and Modelling of the Cell, 46 allée d'Italie Site Jacques Monod, F-69007, Lyon, France.
Olivier GandrillonUniv Lyon, ENS de Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard, CNRS UMR 5239, INSERM U1210, Laboratory of Biology and Modelling of the Cell, 46 allée d'Italie Site Jacques Monod, F-69007, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3676-6513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In some recent studies, a view emerged that stochastic dynamics governing the switching of cells from one differentiation state to another could be characterized by a peak in gene expression variability at the point of fate commitment. We have tested this hypothesis at the single-cell level by analyzing primary chicken erythroid progenitors through their differentiation process and measuring the expression of selected genes at six sequential time-points after induction of differentiation. In contrast to population-based expression data, single-cell gene expression data revealed a high cell-to-cell variability, which was masked by averaging. We were able to show that the correlation network was a very dynamical entity and that a subgroup of genes tend to follow the predictions from the dynamical network biomarker (DNB) theory. In addition, we also identified a small group of functionally related genes encoding proteins involved in sterol synthesis that could act as the initial drivers of the differentiation. In order to assess quantitatively the cell-to-cell variability in gene expression and its evolution in time, we used Shannon entropy as a measure of the heterogeneity. Entropy values showed a significant increase in the first 8 h of the differentiation process, reaching a peak between 8 and 24 h, before decreasing to significantly lower values. Moreover, we observed that the previous point of maximum entropy precedes two paramount key points: an irreversible commitment to differentiation between 24 and 48 h followed by a significant increase in cell size variability at 48 h. In conclusion, when analyzed at the single cell level, the differentiation process looks very different from its classical population average view. New observables (like entropy) can be computed, the behavior of which is fully compatible with the idea that differentiation is not a "simple" program that all cells execute identically but results from the dynamical behavior of the underlying molecular network.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationSingle-Cell AnalysisEntropyGene Expression ProfilingModels, BiologicalStem Cells

Identifiers

PMID28027290
PMCPMC5191835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.