ArticleThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2017
Clinical and Virus Surveillance After the First Wheezing Episode: Special Reference to Rhinovirus A and C Species.
Article in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Predictors of Longitudinal Respiratory Exacerbation Outcomes in Young Hospitalised Children.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025Article
- Propagation of Rhinovirus C in Differentiated Immortalized Human Airway HBEC3-KT Epithelial Cells.Viruses · 2019Article
- Association Between Preceding Viral Respiratory Infection and Subsequent Respiratory Illnesses Among Children: A Prospective Cohort Study in the Philippines.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2019Article
- Rhinovirus species and tonsillar immune responses.Clinical and translational allergy · 2019Article
- Role of viral infections in the development and exacerbation of asthma in children.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSusceptibility to rhinovirus (RV)-induced early wheezing episode has been recognized as an important risk factor for asthma, but the data on different RV species are limited. Our aim was to investigate the risk for recurrences in first-time wheezing children with special focus on RV species.
methodsFirst-time wheezing children (88 inpatients and 23 outpatients) were prospectively followed at 2-week, 2-month and 12-month time-points, and at first recurrence within 12 months. The respiratory virus etiology was analyzed using polymerase chain reaction. RV-positive samples were sequenced. The primary outcomes were time to a new physician-confirmed wheezing episode, time to a new RV-induced wheezing episode and time to the initiation of regular controller medication for asthma symptoms.
resultsThe median age of the children was 12 months (standard deviation, 6.0), 67% were males and 23% were sensitized. RV dominated in symptomatic and asymptomatic infections. Different RV strains were observed in 97% (67/69) of consecutive samples during follow-up. First-time wheezing children with RV-C and RV-A had an increased risk for a new physician-confirmed wheezing episode and a new RV-associated wheezing episode than non-RV group (all P < 0.05). Also, the risk for the initiation of regular controller medication was increased in RV-A and RV-C groups when compared with non-RV group (both P < 0.05).
conclusionsRV causes reinfections with different strains in small children after the first wheezing episode. Both RV-A and RV-C affected children have an increased risk for recurrence, especially RV associated, and initiation of regular controller medication than those with other viruses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.