ArticleRevista espanola de salud publica2017
[Primary and Secondary Prevention of Hip Fragility Fracture in Teruel Health Sector, Aragon, Spain].
Article in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multidisciplinary expert consensus on secondary fracture prevention in Spain.Archives of osteoporosis · 2021Article
- Non-Pharmacological Interventions towards Preventing the Triad Osteoporosis-Falls Risk-Hip Fracture, in Population Older than 65. Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOsteoporosis should be prevented, diagnosed and treated, preferably before the fragility fracture occurs. The objective was to analyze primary and secondary interventions carried out in individuals diagnosed with femur fragility fracture at Teruel in 2014.
methodsDescriptive retrospective study. Variables assessed were sex, age, main health district, place of residence, basal functional situation, diagnosis on osteoporosis, hip or vertebral fracture, loss of height, use of FRAX tool, treatment on discharge, survival and cause of exitus. Student's t-test and ANOVA were used for quantitative variables by categories and regression for linear relationships.
results148 patients were included. 123 were women median age was 87 years, 123 (76,4%) were women, 27,4% of the patients were totally or severely dependent for activities of daily living and 33% of them were living in a nursing home. There was a previous history of hip fracture in 10,1%, and one or more vertebral fractures in 10,1%. FRAX® tool was not used in any case. 12,2% of patients had been treated with calcium prior to fracture, 11,5% with vitamin D, and 6,8% of them with antiosteoporotic drugs. Only 52,7% were treated for secondary prevention after discharge. At the end of follow-up, 25,7% of hip fractured patients had died. Median survivorship of deceased patients was 64,5 days. 42,3% of exitus were caused by cardiovascular disease, 23,1% by infection and 11,5% by neoplasms.
conclusionsPrimary pharmacologic prevention and assessment of osteoporosis or risk of fracture are unfrequent in our health district.. Although pharmacologic treatment is prescribed more frequently in Teruel than in other areas after a hip or vertebral fracture, additional measures should be taken in order to improve fragility fracture prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28025971PMC11587323W3023109456What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.