Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28025786›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2017

EGFR Gene Amplification and KRAS Mutation Predict Response to Combination Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Sajid A Khan, Zhaoshi Zeng, Jinru Shia, Philip B Paty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2018
    Article
  15. Kinases and Cancer.Cancers · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sajid A KhanDepartment of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street, FMB 130, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA. sajid.khan@yale.edu.
Zhaoshi ZengColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jinru ShiaColorectal Service, Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Philip B PatyColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USYale University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NEW METHODS FOR CANCER DETECTIONP01CA065930 · NCI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI BARANY, FRANCIS · 1997 to 2007
$14.1M
SURGICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009501 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Babak J Mehrara · 1985 to 2026
$7.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS P01 CA065930NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variability in KRAS and EGFR predicts response to cetuximab in irinotecan refractory colorectal cancer. Whether these markers or others remain predictive in combination biologic therapies including bevacizumab is unknown. We identified predictive biomarkers from patients with irinotecan refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab plus bevacizumab. Patients who received cetuximab plus bevacizumab for irinotecan refractory colorectal cancer in either of two Phase II trials conducted were identified. Tumor tissue was available for 33 patients. Genomic DNA was extracted and used for mutational analysis of KRAS, BRAF, and p53 genes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed to assess EGFR copy number. The status of single genes and various combinations were tested for association with response. Seven of 33 patients responded to treatment. KRAS mutations were found in 14/33 cases, and 0 responded to treatment (p = 0.01). EGFR gene amplification was seen in 3/33 of tumors and in every case was associated with response to treatment (p < 0.001). TP53 and BRAF mutations were found in 18/33 and 0/33 tumors, respectively, and there were no associations with response to either gene. EGFR gene amplification and KRAS mutations are predictive markers for patients receiving combination biologic therapy of cetuximab plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. One marker or the other is present in the tumor of half of all patients allowing treatment response to be predicted with a high degree of certainty. The role for molecular markers in combination biologic therapy seems promising.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorCamptothecinCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene AmplificationGenes, p53HumansAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBevacizumabBiomarkers, TumorCamptothecinCetuximabEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIrinotecanras ProteinsBevacizumabCetuximabColorectal cancerEGFRKRASMetastasis

Identifiers

PMID28025786
PMCPMC5451302
OpenAlexW2564004547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.