Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28025784›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2017

Multi-scale detection of rate changes in spike trains with weak dependencies.

Michael Messer, Kauê M Costa, Jochen Roeper, Gaby Schneider

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael MesserInstitute of Mathematics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Kauê M CostaInstitute of Neurophysiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jochen RoeperInstitute of Neurophysiology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gaby SchneiderInstitute of Mathematics, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. schneider@math.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5791-6405

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The statistical analysis of neuronal spike trains by models of point processes often relies on the assumption of constant process parameters. However, it is a well-known problem that the parameters of empirical spike trains can be highly variable, such as for example the firing rate. In order to test the null hypothesis of a constant rate and to estimate the change points, a Multiple Filter Test (MFT) and a corresponding algorithm (MFA) have been proposed that can be applied under the assumption of independent inter spike intervals (ISIs). As empirical spike trains often show weak dependencies in the correlation structure of ISIs, we extend the MFT here to point processes associated with short range dependencies. By specifically estimating serial dependencies in the test statistic, we show that the new MFT can be applied to a variety of empirical firing patterns, including positive and negative serial correlations as well as tonic and bursty firing. The new MFT is applied to a data set of empirical spike trains with serial correlations, and simulations show improved performance against methods that assume independence. In case of positive correlations, our new MFT is necessary to reduce the number of false positives, which can be highly enhanced when falsely assuming independence. For the frequent case of negative correlations, the new MFT shows an improved detection probability of change points and thus, also a higher potential of signal extraction from noisy spike trains.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsModels, NeurologicalAlgorithmsHumansNeuronsProbabilityChange point detectionMulti scaleNon-stationarityPoint processesSerial correlationSpike train analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.