Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28025715›Full record

ReviewActa neuropathologica2017

Alzheimer's disease: experimental models and reality.

Eleanor Drummond, Thomas Wisniewski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neuropathologica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 453 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
453citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

453 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 787 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A murine model of amyloid-enhanced tauopathy: Comparison of wild-type and P301L-tau.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

393 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eleanor DrummondCenter for Cognitive Neurology and Department of Neurology, NYU School of Medicine, Alexandria ERSP, 450 East 29th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Thomas WisniewskiCenter for Cognitive Neurology and Departments of Neurology, Pathology and Psychiatry, NYU School of Medicine, Alexandria ERSP, 450 East 29th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA. Thomas.wisniewski@nyumc.org.
Center for Neuro-Oncology · US

Funding

PSYCHOSOCIAL COREP30AG008051 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SHAO, YONGZHAO · 1990 to 2019
$36.1M
Detection and Clearance of AD LesionsR01AG020245 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI WISNIEWSKI, THOMAS M · 2002 to 2016
$4.7M
Therapeutic Targeting of Abnormal Conformation in Neurodegenerative DiseaseR01NS073502 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI WISNIEWSKI, THOMAS M · 2010 to 2019
$3.7M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG008051NIA NIH HHS R01 AG020245NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental models of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are critical to gaining a better understanding of pathogenesis and to assess the potential of novel therapeutic approaches. The most commonly used experimental animal models are transgenic mice that overexpress human genes associated with familial AD (FAD) that result in the formation of amyloid plaques. However, AD is defined by the presence and interplay of both amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangle pathology. The track record of success in AD clinical trials thus far has been very poor. In part, this high failure rate has been related to the premature translation of highly successful results in animal models that mirror only limited aspects of AD pathology to humans. A greater understanding of the strengths and weakness of each of the various models and the use of more than one model to evaluate potential therapies would help enhance the success of therapy translation from preclinical studies to patients. In this review, we summarize the pathological features and limitations of the major experimental models of AD, including transgenic mice, transgenic rats, various physiological models of sporadic AD and in vitro human cell culture models.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedHumans

Identifiers

PMID28025715
PMCPMC5253109
OpenAlexW2563078526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.