Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28025682›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2017

Impact of subsequent birth and delivery mode for women with previous OASIS: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sara S Webb, Derick Yates, Margarita Manresa, Matthew Parsons, Christine MacArthur, Khaled M K Ismail

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara S WebbInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. sara.webb@bwnft.nhs.uk.
Derick YatesBirmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Delivery Suite, Mindlesohn Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TG, UK.
Margarita ManresaFundació hospital, Asil de Granollers, Barcelona, Spain.
Matthew ParsonsBirmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Delivery Suite, Mindlesohn Road, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TG, UK.
Christine MacArthurInstitute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Khaled M K IsmailInstitute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBBirmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GBHospital General de Granollers · ES

Funding

Department of Health CDRF-2012-03-064Department of Health WMCLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisObstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are serious complications of vaginal birth. In a pregnancy following OASIS women may be keen to avoid an elective caesarean section, yet cautious about pursuing another vaginal birth that may result in further damage to the pelvic floor and possible long-term anal incontinence. This review aimed to evaluate the impact of subsequent birth and its mode on anal incontinence (AI) and/or quality of life (QoL), for women with previous OASIS.

methodsSearches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and AMED from inception to February 2016 were undertaken with selection criteria of any study evaluating the effect of a subsequent birth on AI and/or QoL in women with previous OASIS. Where possible, data were extracted to populate 2 × 2 tables and allow meta-analysis relating to the impact of subsequent birth on AI and/or QoL.

resultsTwenty-seven non-randomised studies were included. Meta-analysis of 14 studies (977 women) did not demonstrate any significant associations between AI in women with previous OASIS and subsequent birth or its mode. Impact on QoL was reported in 12 studies (912 women); however, difference in outcome reporting precluded data meta-analysis.

conclusionsComparisons of outcomes and effective synthesis were limited by sample size, quality and heterogeneity of the studies included. Consequently, the optimal mode of delivery for women with previous OASIS is still not known and better data are needed.

Indexed as

Anal CanalDelivery, ObstetricFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansPelvic Floor DisordersPregnancyBowel functionOASISQuality of lifeSubsequent birthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28025682
OpenAlexW2565019067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.