Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28025678›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2017

Enlightening the mechanisms of POP recurrence after LeFort colpocleisis. Case report and review.

Themistoklis Mikos, Mariliz Chatzipanteli, Grigoris F Grimbizis, Basil C Tarlatzis

Abstract readCase ReportsSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The "Repeat Colpocleisis": A Literature Review and Case Report.International urogynecology journal · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Modified Lefort partial colpocleisis.International urogynecology journal · 2021
    Article
  5. Colpocleisis with a skin flap.International urogynecology journal · 2020
    Article
  6. LeFort colpocleisis for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Le Fort Partial Colpocleisis: A Low-Cost Model.Journal of medical education and curricular development
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Themistoklis MikosUnit of Urogynecology, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papagheorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece. themis.mikos@gmail.com.
Mariliz ChatzipanteliUnit of Urogynecology, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papagheorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Grigoris F GrimbizisUnit of Urogynecology, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papagheorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Basil C TarlatzisUnit of Urogynecology, 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papagheorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisObliterative procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse have been reported to have a recurrence rate up to 10%. We present (1) a case report of a patient with prolapse after LeFort colpocleisis and how it was managed in our department, and (2) a review of the literature regarding the types of recurrence after LeFort colpocleisis, their rate and their treatment.

methodsA 77-year-old woman was treated in our department for recurrence of prolapse through the right lateral channel 6 months after LeFort colpocleisis. A systematic review of the literature up to 2016 was performed through MEDLINE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library.

resultsThe patient underwent a modified repeat colpocleisis and 6 months later was doing well with no signs of recurrence. We found 28 eligible studies including 1,810 patients, and the rate of recurrence after LeFort colpocleisis was 4.2% (76/1,810) leaving the majority of patients very satisfied. Information about the management of recurrence of prolapse after LeFort colpocleisis was provided in 17 studies including 33 patients with a 60-month follow-up. It appears that there are three major categories of recurrent prolapse after LeFort partial colpocleisis: (1) patients with a total breakdown of colpocleisis (57.6%), (2) patients with "channel prolapse" (15.2%), and (3) patients with prolapse at sites not involved in the primary partial colpocleisis (27.3%). The most frequent treatments were total colpocleisis/colpectomy (27.3%), perineorrhaphy and posterior repair (9.1%) and hysterectomy (9.1%). Almost 50% of these patients opted not to have surgical treatment.

conclusionsThe rate of prolapse recurrence after LeFort colpocleisis is estimated to be 4.2%. The management of recurrences after LeFort colpocleisis depends on the time and type of recurrence. The repeat modified LeFort colpocleisis is a viable option in patients with channel prolapse; if no uterus exists, colpectomy appears to be the best option.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresPelvic Organ ProlapseAgedFemaleHumansRecurrenceChannel prolapseColpectomyLeFort colpocleisisRecurrence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.