Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28025663›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2017

Conservative management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: an update.

A Slavici, M Rauschmann, C Fleege

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: predictive factors for conservative treatment failure. A systematic review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review of Current Spinal Robotic Orthoses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fragility fractures of the spine.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A SlaviciOrthopedic University Hospital Frankfurt, Marienburgstraße 2, 60528, Frankfurt, Germany.
M RauschmannDepartment of Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Orthopedic University Hospital Frankfurt, Marienburgstraße 2, 60528, Frankfurt, Germany.
C FleegeDepartment of Orthopedic Spine Surgery, Orthopedic University Hospital Frankfurt, Marienburgstraße 2, 60528, Frankfurt, Germany. c.fleege@friedrichsheim.de.
University Hospital Frankfurt · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdequate conservative management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures remains important in an aging population.

methodsWe performed a research of multiple databases and present important studies in this narrative review.

resultsThe pertinent literature remains scarce and of mixed quality. However, trends are shown to support early mobilization, less rigid bracing and pharmaceutical secondary prevention.

conclusionThere is insufficient data to recommend the optimal conservative management for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. As such high-quality studies need to be conducted to establish a solid course of action.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentBracesEarly AmbulationHumansOsteoporotic FracturesSecondary PreventionSpinal FracturesBracingConservative therapyOsteoporotic fracturesVertebral fractures

Identifiers

PMID28025663
OpenAlexW2566233089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.