Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2017
The effect of a Live-high Train-high exercise regimen on behavioural temperature regulation.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAcute hypoxia alters the threshold for sensation of cutaneous thermal stimuli. We hypothesised that hypoxia-induced alterations in cutaneous temperature sensation may lead to modulation of the perception of temperature, ultimately influencing behavioural thermoregulation and that the magnitude of this effect could be influenced by daily physical training.
methodsFourteen men were confined 10 days to a normobaric hypoxic environment (P
resultsThe average width of the TCZ did not differ between the control group (9.0 ± 6.9 °C), and the LH and LH-TH groups on days HC2 (7.2 ± 4.2 °C) and HC10 (10.2 ± 7.5 °C) of the hypoxic exposure (p = 0.256). [Formula: see text] was marginally higher on HC2 (35.9 ± 1.0 °C) compared to control (34.9 ± 0.8 °C, p = 0.040), but not on HC10 (35.6 ± 1.0 °C), reflecting the responses of hand perfusion.
conclusionThere was a little systematic effect of hypoxia or exercise training on TCZ magnitude or boundary temperatures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28025662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.