ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2016
Designing Biomaterials for 3D Printing.
Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
171 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fibrin scaffolds for angiogenesis in soft tissue models: a systematic review.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Development of a 3D-printable bioactive polycaprolactone-collagen peptides filament for biomedical applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The 3D Printing of Flexible Materials: Technologies, Materials, and Challenges.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- eSolubilized amniotic membrane ECM as a promising biological surface treatment approach for 3D-printed bone tissue engineering scaffolds.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Material Extrusion of the Poly(lactic acid)/HAp Nanocomposite Scaffold for Bone Tissue Applications: A Comprehensive Investigation.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Melt-Extrusion Additive Manufacturing for Tissue Engineering: Applications and Limitations.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2025Article
- Tailoring Therapy: Hydrogels as Tunable Platforms for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Intervention.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Impact of Ink Composition and Its Physical Properties on the Selected Attributes of 3D-Printed Fruit Purées with Hydrocolloid Molecules.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Smart injectable hydrogels for periodontal regeneration: Recent advancements in biomaterials and biofabrication strategies.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Nano- and Microstructured Systems for Controlled Release of Agricultural Inputs: Innovations for Efficiency and Sustainability.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Bone Tissue Engineering: Enhancing the Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Regenerative Therapies.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Advances in 3D printing combined with tissue engineering for nerve regeneration and repair.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Concept and Evolution in 3D Printing for Excellence in Healthcare.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Application and progress of 3D printed biomaterials in osteoporosis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Leveraging Blood Components for 3D Printing Applications Through Programmable Ink Engineering Approaches.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- 3D-Printed Hydrogels as Photothermal Actuators.Polymers · 2024Article
- Review
- Graphene Oxide (GO)-Based Bioink with Enhanced 3D Printability and Mechanical Properties for Tissue Engineering Applications.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is becoming an increasingly common technique to fabricate scaffolds and devices for tissue engineering applications. This is due to the potential of 3D printing to provide patient-specific designs, high structural complexity, rapid on-demand fabrication at a low-cost. One of the major bottlenecks that limits the widespread acceptance of 3D printing in biomanufacturing is the lack of diversity in "biomaterial inks". Printability of a biomaterial is determined by the printing technique. Although a wide range of biomaterial inks including polymers, ceramics, hydrogels and composites have been developed, the field is still struggling with processing of these materials into self-supporting devices with tunable mechanics, degradation, and bioactivity. This review aims to highlight the past and recent advances in biomaterial ink development and design considerations moving forward. A brief overview of 3D printing technologies focusing on ink design parameters is also included.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.