Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28025375›Full record

ReviewPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2016

Intrathecal Therapy for Cancer-Related Pain.

Brian M Bruel, Allen W Burton

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07733427 (A Pilot Study Aimed at Evaluating the Effectiveness of AIT in the Treatment of Pain Related to Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07733427 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study Aimed at Evaluating the Effectiveness of AIT in the Treatment of Pain Related to Pancreatic Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinique BizetRan2026 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsPancreatic Cancer Pain, Intrathecal Analgesic, Intrathecal Administration of the Drug, Pancreatic CarcinomaArmsIntrathecal catheter connected to an implantable pump, Administration of medication, including analgesics, via an intrathecal catheter connected to an implantable pump or via periodic injections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian M Bruel*University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas Brian.Bruel@bcm.edu.
Allen W BurtonSt. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
St. Jude Medical Foundation · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe increasing incidence of cancer survivorship has shifted treatment of cancer-related pain from short-term analgesia to long-term chronic pain management. As a result, alternatives to oral analgesics, such as intrathecal therapy, may be beneficial for patients with cancer-related pain. The authors review the use of intrathecal therapy in the management of cancer-related pain.

methodsThe Medline database was searched for English-language articles that included "ziconotide" or "morphine" AND ("cancer" OR "malignant") AND "intrathecal" in title or abstract. Available abstracts from scientific congresses in the areas of neuromodulation and oncology were also reviewed.

resultsIntrathecal therapy provides pain relief with reduced systemic concerns in patients with cancer-related pain. Patients should undergo multidisciplinary evaluation and, in most cases, drug trialing before intrathecal pump implantation. Morphine, an opioid ( Μ: -opioid receptor antagonist), and ziconotide, a nonopioid (selective N-type calcium channel inhibitor), are both approved for intrathecal analgesia; however, tolerance and safety concerns may deter the use of intrathecal morphine. Ziconotide has also shown efficacy for reduction of cancer-related pain; however, proper dosing and titration must be used to prevent adverse events. There is little information available on use of intrathecal therapies specifically in cancer survivors.

conclusionsTreatment of cancer-related pain has shifted toward chronic pain management strategies, especially among cancer survivors. Intrathecal therapy provides an alternate route of administration of chronic pain medications (e.g., morphine and ziconotide) for cancer patients with and without active disease, although additional research is needed to support effectiveness in cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Injections, SpinalAnalgesicsCancer PainHumansAnalgesicsCancer SurvivorsChronic PainIntrathecal Implantable Drug Delivery SystemMorphineOpioidZiconotide

Identifiers

PMID28025375
PMCPMC5654346
OpenAlexW2345243116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.