Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28025291›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2017

Evolution of genome size and genomic GC content in carnivorous holokinetics (Droseraceae).

Adam Veleba, Petr Šmarda, František Zedek, Lucie Horová, Jakub Šmerda, Petr Bureš

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Endoreplication-Why Are We Not Using Its Full Application Potential?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reference standards for flow cytometric estimation of absolute nuclear DNA content in plants.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2022
    Review
  12. Transcriptional differences between majorFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. The Evolution of Cytogenetic Traits inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Characteristics analysis of the completePhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2020
    Article
  19. Do holocentric chromosomes represent an evolutionary advantage? A study of paired analyses of diversification rates of lineages with holocentric chromosomes and their monocentric closest relatives.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam VelebaDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, CZ 61137, Czech Republic.
Petr ŠmardaDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, CZ 61137, Czech Republic.
František ZedekDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, CZ 61137, Czech Republic.
Lucie HorováDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, CZ 61137, Czech Republic.
Jakub ŠmerdaDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, CZ 61137, Czech Republic.
Petr BurešDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, CZ 61137, Czech Republic bures@sci.muni.cz.
Masaryk University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsStudies in the carnivorous family Lentibulariaceae in the last years resulted in the discovery of the smallest plant genomes and an unusual pattern of genomic GC content evolution. However, scarcity of genomic data in other carnivorous clades still prevents a generalization of the observed patterns. Here the aim was to fill this gap by mapping genome evolution in the second largest carnivorous family, Droseraceae, where this evolution may be affected by chromosomal holokinetism in Drosera

methodsThe genome size and genomic GC content of 71 Droseraceae species were measured by flow cytometry. A dated phylogeny was constructed, and the evolution of both genomic parameters and their relationship to species climatic niches were tested using phylogeny-based statistics. KEY

resultsThe 2C genome size of Droseraceae varied between 488 and 10 927 Mbp, and the GC content ranged between 37·1 and 44·7 %. The genome sizes and genomic GC content of carnivorous and holocentric species did not differ from those of their non-carnivorous and monocentric relatives. The genomic GC content positively correlated with genome size and annual temperature fluctuations. The genome size and chromosome numbers were inversely correlated in the Australian clade of Drosera

conclusionsOur results indicate that neither carnivory (nutrient scarcity) nor the holokinetism have a prominent effect on size and DNA base composition of Droseraceae genomes. However, the holokinetic drive seems to affect karyotype evolution in one of the major clades of Drosera Our survey confirmed that the evolution of GC content is tightly connected with the evolution of genome size and also with environmental conditions.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBase CompositionCarnivoryChromosomes, PlantDroseraceaeGenetic VariationGenome, PlantPhylogenycarnivorous plantsDNA base compositionDNA contentDroseraceaeflow cytometryGC contentgenome size evolutionholocentric chromosomesholokinetic chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID28025291
PMCPMC5314647
OpenAlexW2564956542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.