Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28025250›Full record

ArticleGlycobiology2017

Glycosylation of MUC1 influences the binding of a therapeutic antibody by altering the conformational equilibrium of the antigen.

Mohammadreza Movahedin, Teresa M Brooks, Nitin T Supekar, Naveen Gokanapudi, Geert-Jan Boons, Cory L Brooks

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Glycobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Antibody-Antigen Epitope Mapping by X-Ray Crystallography.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammadreza MovahedinDepartment of Chemistry, California State University Fresno, 2555 E San Ramon Ave, Fresno, CA 93740, USA.
Teresa M BrooksDepartment of Chemistry, California State University Fresno, 2555 E San Ramon Ave, Fresno, CA 93740, USA.
Nitin T SupekarComplex Carbohydrate Research Center, 315 Riverbend Road, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Naveen GokanapudiDepartment of Chemistry, California State University Fresno, 2555 E San Ramon Ave, Fresno, CA 93740, USA.
Geert-Jan BoonsComplex Carbohydrate Research Center, 315 Riverbend Road, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Cory L BrooksDepartment of Chemistry, California State University Fresno, 2555 E San Ramon Ave, Fresno, CA 93740, USA.
California State University, Fresno · USUniversity of Georgia · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Synthesis/Immunological Properties of Lewis AntigensR01CA088986 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI BOONS, GEERT-JAN · 2002 to 2015
$4.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA088986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cancer cells, the glycoprotein Mucin 1 (MUC1) undergoes abnormal, truncated glycosylation. The truncated glycosylation exposes cryptic peptide epitopes that can be recognized by antibodies. Since these immunogenic regions are cancer specific, they represent ideal targets for therapeutic antibodies. We investigated the role of tumor-specific glycosylation on antigen recognition by the therapeutic antibody AR20.5. We explored the affinity of AR20.5 to a synthetic cancer-specific MUC1 glycopeptide and peptide. The antibody bound to the glycopeptide with an order of magnitude stronger affinity than the naked peptide. Given these results, we postulated that AR20.5 must specifically bind the carbohydrate as well as the peptide. Using X-ray crystallography, we examined this hypothesis by determining the structure of AR20.5 in complex with both peptide and glycopeptide. Surprisingly, the structure revealed that the carbohydrate did not form any specific polar contacts with the antibody. The high affinity of AR20.5 for the glycopeptide and the lack of specific binding contacts support a hypothesis that glycosylation of MUC1 stabilizes an extended bioactive conformation of the peptide recognized by the antibody. Since high affinity binding of AR20.5 to the MUC1 glycopeptide may not driven by specific antibody-antigen contacts, but rather evidence suggests that glycosylation alters the conformational equilibrium of the antigen, which allows the antibody to select the correct conformation. This study suggests a novel mechanism of antibody-antigen interaction and also suggests that glycosylation of MUC1 is important for the generation of high affinity therapeutic antibodies.

Indexed as

Antibody AffinityProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAntibodies, MonoclonalBinding Sites, AntibodyGlycosylationHumansHybridomasMolecular Docking SimulationMucin-1Protein BindingAntibodies, MonoclonalmAb-AR20.5Mucin-1cancercrystal structureimmunotherapymolecular recognitionmucin

Identifiers

PMID28025250
PMCPMC5881634
OpenAlexW2565744488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.