Trial reportEuropean heart journal2017
Cardiopoietic cell therapy for advanced ischaemic heart failure: results at 39 weeks of the prospective, randomized, double blind, sham-controlled CHART-1 clinical trial.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
118 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of stem cell therapy for myocardial infarction and heart failure: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiomyocyte regeneration therapy and its effect on LVEF and scar size- a systematic review and meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on major adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac function indices in patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell versus bone-marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- Dose-response relationship of MSCs as living Bio-drugs in HFrEF patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Pooled it
- An updated systematic review on heart failure treatments for patients with renal impairment: the tide is not turning.Heart failure reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Stem cell therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Adult Stem Cell Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Ischemic Heart Failure (SafeCell Heart): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stem cells translational medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Rivaroxaban in Peripheral Artery Disease After Revascularization: Worst Events and Net Outcomes in VOYAGER PAD.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Cell Therapy Improves Quality-of-Life in Heart Failure: Outcomes From a Phase III Clinical Trial.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Trial
- Effect of cardiosphere-derived cells on segmental myocardial function after myocardial infarction: ALLSTAR randomised clinical trial.Open heart · 2021Trial
- Effect of Intramyocardial Grafting Collagen Scaffold With Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Patients With Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Myeloablative Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation for Severe Scleroderma.The New England journal of medicine · 2018Trial
- Dose Comparison Study of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (The TRIDENT Study).Circulation research · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Cardiac Function Improvement and Bone Marrow Response -: Outcome Analysis of the Randomized PERFECT Phase III Clinical Trial of Intramyocardial CD133EBioMedicine · 2017Trial
- Effect of Stem Cell Therapy on Patients' Quality of Life in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of medicine and lifeTrial
- Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy in Cardiovascular Disease: Reconsidering Clinical Inconsistency Through the Mechanism-Endpoint Relationship.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
55 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsCardiopoietic cells, produced through cardiogenic conditioning of patients' mesenchymal stem cells, have shown preliminary efficacy. The Congestive Heart Failure Cardiopoietic Regenerative Therapy (CHART-1) trial aimed to validate cardiopoiesis-based biotherapy in a larger heart failure cohort. METHODS AND
resultsThis multinational, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study was conducted in 39 hospitals. Patients with symptomatic ischaemic heart failure on guideline-directed therapy (n = 484) were screened; n = 348 underwent bone marrow harvest and mesenchymal stem cell expansion. Those achieving > 24 million mesenchymal stem cells (n = 315) were randomized to cardiopoietic cells delivered endomyocardially with a retention-enhanced catheter (n = 157) or sham procedure (n = 158). Procedures were performed as randomized in 271 patients (n = 120 cardiopoietic cells, n = 151 sham). The primary efficacy endpoint was a Finkelstein-Schoenfeld hierarchical composite (all-cause mortality, worsening heart failure, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score, 6-min walk distance, left ventricular end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction) at 39 weeks. The primary outcome was neutral (Mann-Whitney estimator 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.61 [value > 0.5 favours cell treatment], P = 0.27). Exploratory analyses suggested a benefit of cell treatment on the primary composite in patients with baseline left ventricular end-diastolic volume 200-370 mL (60% of patients) (Mann-Whitney estimator 0.61, 95% CI 0.52-0.70, P = 0.015). No difference was observed in serious adverse events. One (0.9%) cardiopoietic cell patient and 9 (5.4%) sham patients experienced aborted or sudden cardiac death.
conclusionThe primary endpoint was neutral, with safety demonstrated across the cohort. Further evaluation of cardiopoietic cell therapy in patients with elevated end-diastolic volume is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.