Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28025007›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2017

Brain Rhythms of Pain.

Markus Ploner, Christian Sorg, Joachim Gross

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 218 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
218citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03805854 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Modulating Pain Using Transcranial Alternating Stimulation (tACS) in Healthy Human Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorTechnical University of MunichRan2019 to 2019Enrolled39ConditionsExperimental Pain in Healthy Human SubjectsArms10 Hz tACS of the bilateral somatosensory cortex, 10 Hz tACS of the prefrontal cortex, 80 Hz tACS of the bilateral somatosensory cortex, 80 Hz tACS of the prefrontal cortex, Sham stimulation of the bilateral somatosensory cortex
NCT05099406 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Brain and Pain (BaP): Understanding the Central Mechanisms of Pain to Improve Management of Patients With Refractory Chronic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsChronic PainArmsTranscranial electrical stimulation
NCT05261243 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

EEG-characteristics of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Chronic Pain

TypeobservationalSponsorTechnical University of MunichRan2022 to 2023Enrolled150ConditionsChronic PainArmsEEG / questionnaires / working memory task
NCT05570695 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

How do Alpha Oscillations Shape the Perception of Pain? - An EEG-based Neurofeedback Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTechnical University of MunichRan2022 to 2023Enrolled75ConditionsExperimental Pain in Healthy Human SubjectsArmsattention right training, ARTNF, attention left training, ALTNF, sham attention right training, ARTsham, sham attention left training, ALTsham
NCT06510244 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Measuring Pain Perception to the Same Stimulus in Different Patients Using Electroencephalography and Numerical Rate Scale

TypeobservationalSponsorCleveland Dental InstituteRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsPain, Electroencephalography, ToothacheArmsEEG EMOTIV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

218 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Potential applications of artificial intelligence in pain management: a scoping review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Review

158 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Markus PlonerDepartment of Neurology and TUMNeuroimaging Center, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: markus.ploner@tum.de.
Christian SorgDepartments of Neuroradiology and Psychiatry and TUMNeuroimaging Center, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Joachim GrossInstitute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009742/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain is an integrative phenomenon that results from dynamic interactions between sensory and contextual (i.e., cognitive, emotional, and motivational) processes. In the brain the experience of pain is associated with neuronal oscillations and synchrony at different frequencies. However, an overarching framework for the significance of oscillations for pain remains lacking. Recent concepts relate oscillations at different frequencies to the routing of information flow in the brain and the signaling of predictions and prediction errors. The application of these concepts to pain promises insights into how flexible routing of information flow coordinates diverse processes that merge into the experience of pain. Such insights might have implications for the understanding and treatment of chronic pain.

Indexed as

CognitionEmotionsBrainBrain WavesHumansMotivationNeuronsPainbraininformation flowoscillationspainpredictive coding

Identifiers

PMID28025007
PMCPMC5374269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.