Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28024860›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2017

How hearing about harmful chemicals affects smokers' interest in dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes.

Jessica K Pepper, M Justin Byron, Kurt M Ribisl, Noel T Brewer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Feeling Hopeful Motivates Change: Emotional Responses to Messages Communicating Comparative Risk of Electronic Cigarettes and Combusted Cigarettes.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2019
    Trial
  3. Targeted Versus Nontargeted Communication About Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems in Three Smoker Groups.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Similarities and Differences in Tobacco Control Research Findings From Convenience and Probability Samples.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. E-Cigarette Marketing and Communication: How E-Cigarette Companies Market E-Cigarettes and the Public Engages with E-cigarette Information.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica K PepperDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Rosenau Hall, CB#7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; RTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. Electronic address: jpepper@rti.org.
M Justin ByronDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Rosenau Hall, CB#7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Drive, CB#7295, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Kurt M RibislDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Rosenau Hall, CB#7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Drive, CB#7295, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Noel T BrewerDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, 135 Dauer Drive, Rosenau Hall, CB#7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Drive, CB#7295, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Funding

Training & Education Program p294-308P50CA180907 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RIBISL, KURT M. · 2013 to 2017
$20.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial harm could result from concurrent cigarette and e-cigarette use (i.e., dual use) were it to undermine smoking cessation. Perceptions of chemical exposure and resulting harms may influence dual use. We conducted a probability-based phone survey of 1164 U.S. adult cigarette smokers in 2014-2015 and analyzed results in 2016. In a between-subjects experiment, smokers heard a hypothetical scenario in which cigarettes and e-cigarettes had the same amount of harmful chemicals or cigarettes had more chemicals than e-cigarettes (10× more, 100× more, or chemicals were present only in cigarettes). Smokers indicated how the scenario would change their interest in dual use and perceived health harms. Few smokers (7%) who heard that the products have the same amount of chemicals were interested in initiating or increasing dual use. However, more smokers were interested when told that cigarettes have 10× more chemicals than e-cigarettes (31%), 100× more chemicals than e-cigarettes (32%), or chemicals were present only in cigarettes (43%) (all p<.001). Individuals told that cigarettes have more chemicals were more likely than those in the "same amount" scenario to perceive that cigarettes would be more harmful than e-cigarettes (79% vs. 41%, OR=5.41, 95% CI=4.08-7.17). These harm perceptions partially explained the relationship between chemical scenario and dual use interest. Smokers associated higher chemical amounts in cigarettes versus e-cigarettes with greater health harms from cigarettes and thus expressed increased interest in dual use. The findings suggest that disclosing amounts of chemicals in cigarette smoke and e-cigarette aerosol could unintentionally encourage dual use.

Indexed as

AdultElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMalePerceptionSmokingTobacco ProductsUnited StatesElectronic cigarettesSmokingTobacco products

Identifiers

PMID28024860
PMCPMC5329070
OpenAlexW2565160636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.