Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28024752›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2017

Nationwide reconnaissance of contaminants of emerging concern in source and treated drinking waters of the United States.

Susan T Glassmeyer, Edward T Furlong, Dana W Kolpin, Angela L Batt, Robert Benson, J Scott Boone, Octavia Conerly, Maura J Donohue, Dawn N King, Mitchell S Kostich and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Lithium Removal From Drinking Water.AWWA water science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Susan T GlassmeyerUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: glassmeyer.susan@epa.gov.
Edward T FurlongUSGS, National Water Quality Laboratory, Denver Federal Center, Bldg 95, Denver, CO 80225, United States. Electronic address: efurlong@usgs.gov.
Dana W KolpinUSGS, 400 S. Clinton St, Rm 269 Federal Building, Iowa City, IA 52240, United States. Electronic address: dwkolpin@usgs.gov.
Angela L BattUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: batt.angela@epa.gov.
Robert BensonUSEPA, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop St., Mail Code: 8P-W, Denver, CO 80202-1129, United States. Electronic address: benson.bob@epa.gov.
J Scott BooneUSEPA, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Stennis Space Center, MS, United States. Electronic address: sboone@mscl.msstate.edu.
Octavia ConerlyUSEPA, Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, William Jefferson Clinton Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W., Mail Code: 4304T, Washington, DC 20460, United States. Electronic address: conerly.octavia@epa.gov.
Maura J DonohueUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: donohue.maura@epa.gov.
Dawn N KingUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: king.dawn@epa.gov.
Mitchell S KostichUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: kostich.mitchell@epa.gov.
Heath E MashUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: mash.heath@epa.gov.
Stacy L PfallerUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: pfaller.stacy@epa.gov.
Kathleen M SchenckUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: Schenck.kathleen@epa.gov.
Jane Ellen SimmonsUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States. Electronic address: simmons.jane@epa.gov.
Eunice A VarugheseUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: varughese.eunice@epa.gov.
Stephen J VesperUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: vesper.stephen@epa.gov.
Eric N VillegasUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268, United States. Electronic address: villegas.eric@epa.gov.
Vickie S WilsonUSEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, United States. Electronic address: wilson.vickie@epa.gov.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When chemical or microbial contaminants are assessed for potential effect or possible regulation in ambient and drinking waters, a critical first step is determining if the contaminants occur and if they are at concentrations that may cause human or ecological health concerns. To this end, source and treated drinking water samples from 29 drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) were analyzed as part of a two-phase study to determine whether chemical and microbial constituents, many of which are considered contaminants of emerging concern, were detectable in the waters. Of the 84 chemicals monitored in the 9 Phase I DWTPs, 27 were detected at least once in the source water, and 21 were detected at least once in treated drinking water. In Phase II, which was a broader and more comprehensive assessment, 247 chemical and microbial analytes were measured in 25 DWTPs, with 148 detected at least once in the source water, and 121 detected at least once in the treated drinking water. The frequency of detection was often related to the analyte's contaminant class, as pharmaceuticals and anthropogenic waste indicators tended to be infrequently detected and more easily removed during treatment, while per and polyfluoroalkyl substances and inorganic constituents were both more frequently detected and, overall, more resistant to treatment. The data collected as part of this project will be used to help inform evaluation of unregulated contaminants in surface water, groundwater, and drinking water.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringWater PurificationDrinking WaterGroundwaterUnited StatesWater Pollutants, ChemicalDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalContaminants of emerging concernDrinking waterMicroorganismsPharmaceuticalsSource water

Identifiers

PMID28024752
PMCPMC7017586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.