Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28024298›Full record

ArticleNature2017

Genome sequence and genetic diversity of European ash trees.

Elizabeth S A Sollars, Andrea L Harper, Laura J Kelly, Christine M Sambles, Ricardo H Ramirez-Gonzalez, David Swarbreck, Gemy Kaithakottil, Endymion D Cooper, Cristobal Uauy, Lenka Havlickova and 20 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 233 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Early-Stage Growth Restriction ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  6. TheForestry research · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Elizabeth S A SollarsSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Andrea L HarperCentre for Novel Agricultural Products, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Laura J KellySchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Christine M SamblesBiosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Ricardo H Ramirez-GonzalezEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UZ, UK.
David SwarbreckEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UZ, UK.
Gemy KaithakottilEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UZ, UK.
Endymion D CooperSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Cristobal UauyJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Lenka HavlickovaCentre for Novel Agricultural Products, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Gemma WorswickSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
David J StudholmeBiosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Jasmin ZohrenSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Deborah L SalmonBiosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Bernardo J ClavijoEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UZ, UK.
Yi LiCentre for Novel Agricultural Products, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Zhesi HeCentre for Novel Agricultural Products, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Alison FellgettCentre for Novel Agricultural Products, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Lea Vig McKinneyDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Lene Rostgaard NielsenDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Gerry C DouglasTeagasc, Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Ashtown, Dublin D15 KN3K, Ireland.
Erik Dahl KjærDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
J Allan DownieJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
David BoshierDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK.
Steve LeeForest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, UK.
Jo ClarkEarth Trust, Little Wittenham, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4QZ, UK.
Murray GrantBiosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK.
Ian BancroftCentre for Novel Agricultural Products, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.
Mario CaccamoEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UZ, UK.
Richard J A BuggsSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of York · GBNorwich Research Park · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBEarlham Institute · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKEarth Trust · GBForest Research · GBTeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F011652/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L012162/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000C0628Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000CA523
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ash trees (genus Fraxinus, family Oleaceae) are widespread throughout the Northern Hemisphere, but are being devastated in Europe by the fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, causing ash dieback, and in North America by the herbivorous beetle Agrilus planipennis. Here we sequence the genome of a low-heterozygosity Fraxinus excelsior tree from Gloucestershire, UK, annotating 38,852 protein-coding genes of which 25% appear ash specific when compared with the genomes of ten other plant species. Analyses of paralogous genes suggest a whole-genome duplication shared with olive (Olea europaea, Oleaceae). We also re-sequence 37 F. excelsior trees from Europe, finding evidence for apparent long-term decline in effective population size. Using our reference sequence, we re-analyse association transcriptomic data, yielding improved markers for reduced susceptibility to ash dieback. Surveys of these markers in British populations suggest that reduced susceptibility to ash dieback may be more widespread in Great Britain than in Denmark. We also present evidence that susceptibility of trees to H. fraxineus is associated with their iridoid glycoside levels. This rapid, integrated, multidisciplinary research response to an emerging health threat in a non-model organism opens the way for mitigation of the epidemic.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAscomycotaConserved SequenceDenmarkFraxinusGenes, PlantGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome, PlantGenomicsIridoid GlycosidesPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsPopulation DensitySequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityTranscriptomeIridoid GlycosidesPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28024298
OpenAlexW2564511910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.