Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28024105›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2017

Assessing and managing multiple risks in a changing world-The Roskilde recommendations.

Henriette Selck, Peter B Adamsen, Thomas Backhaus, Gary T Banta, Peter K H Bruce, G Allen Burton, Michael B Butts, Eva Boegh, John J Clague, Khuong V Dinh and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Open Science in regulatory environmental risk assessment.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The value of nature: Economic, intrinsic, or both?Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2017
    Article
  5. Ecosystem services deserve better than "dirty paper".Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Henriette SelckRoskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Peter B AdamsenRamboll Environ, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas BackhausUniversity of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Gary T BantaRoskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Peter K H BruceStockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
G Allen BurtonUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Michael B ButtsDHI Group, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eva BoeghRoskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
John J ClagueSimon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Khuong V DinhTechnical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Neelke DoornDelft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Jonas S GunnarssonStockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik Hauggaard-NielsenRoskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Charles HazleriggEnviresearch, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Agnieszka D HunkaHalmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.
John JensenAarhus University, Silkeborg, Denmark.
Yan LinNorwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway.
Susana LoureiroDepartment of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Simona MiragliaTechnical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Wayne R MunnsUS Environmental Protection Agency, Narragansett, Rhode Island.
Farrokh NadimNorwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Annemette PalmqvistRoskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Robert A RämöStockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lauren P SeabyRoskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Kristian SybergRoskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Stine R TangaaRoskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Amalie ThitRoskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Ronja WindfeldRoskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Maciej ZalewskiEuropean Regional Centre for Ecohydrology (Polish Academy of Sciences), Lodz, Poland.
Peter M ChapmanChapema Environmental Strategies, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Roskilde University (Denmark) hosted a November 2015 workshop, Environmental Risk-Assessing and Managing Multiple Risks in a Changing World. This Focus article presents the consensus recommendations of 30 attendees from 9 countries regarding implementation of a common currency (ecosystem services) for holistic environmental risk assessment and management; improvements to risk assessment and management in a complex, human-modified, and changing world; appropriate development of protection goals in a 2-stage process; dealing with societal issues; risk-management information needs; conducting risk assessment of risk management; and development of adaptive and flexible regulatory systems. The authors encourage both cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches to address their 10 recommendations: 1) adopt ecosystem services as a common currency for risk assessment and management; 2) consider cumulative stressors (chemical and nonchemical) and determine which dominate to best manage and restore ecosystem services; 3) fully integrate risk managers and communities of interest into the risk-assessment process; 4) fully integrate risk assessors and communities of interest into the risk-management process; 5) consider socioeconomics and increased transparency in both risk assessment and risk management; 6) recognize the ethical rights of humans and ecosystems to an adequate level of protection; 7) determine relevant reference conditions and the proper ecological context for assessments in human-modified systems; 8) assess risks and benefits to humans and the ecosystem and consider unintended consequences of management actions; 9) avoid excessive conservatism or possible underprotection resulting from sole reliance on binary, numerical benchmarks; and 10) develop adaptive risk-management and regulatory goals based on ranges of uncertainty. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017;36:7-16. © 2016 SETAC.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemRisk ManagementCongresses as TopicConservation of Natural ResourcesDenmarkEcologyHumansInternational CooperationRisk AssessmentClimate changeEcosystem servicesMultiple environmental stressorsRisk assessmentRisk managementWicked problems

Identifiers

PMID28024105
PMCPMC6130322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.