Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28018986›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2016

A Roadmap for the Development of Applied Computational Psychiatry.

Martin P Paulus, Quentin J M Huys, Tiago V Maia

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Reinforcement-Learning-Informed Queries Guide Behavioral Change.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  12. Revisiting the role of computational neuroimaging in the era of integrative neuroscience.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Latent-state and model-based learning in PTSD.Trends in neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Closing the loop in psychiatric deep brain stimulation: physiology, psychometrics, and plasticity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin P PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK; Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Quentin J M HuysTranslational Neuromodeling Unit, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Zurich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, Switzerland; Centre for Addictive Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Tiago V MaiaInstitute for Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal.
Laureate Institute for Brain Research · USUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041089 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Joanna Jacobus, Susan F. Tapert · 2015 to 2026
$31.7M
Neuroimaging CoreP20DA027843 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SCHULTEIS, GERHARD G · 2010 to 2013
$3.5M
Latent Constructs: Negative-Positive Valence Domains in Anxiety and DepressionR01MH101453 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAULUS, MARTIN P. · 2013 to 2016
$1.9M
Negative reinforcement and interoceptive dysfunction in stimulant dependence.R01DA027797 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PAULUS, MARTIN P. · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS P20 DA027843NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027797NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041089NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputational psychiatry is a burgeoning field that utilizes mathematical approaches to investigate psychiatric disorders, derive quantitative predictions, and integrate data across multiple levels of description. Computational psychiatry has already led to many new insights into the neurobehavioral mechanisms that underlie several psychiatric disorders, but its usefulness from a clinical standpoint is only now starting to be considered.

methodsExamples of computational psychiatry are highlighted, and a phase-based pipeline for the development of clinical computational-psychiatry applications is proposed, similar to the phase-based pipeline used in drug development. It is proposed that each phase has unique endpoints and deliverables, which will be important milestones to move tasks, procedures, computational models, and algorithms from the laboratory to clinical practice.

resultsApplication of computational approaches should be tested on healthy volunteers in Phase I, transitioned to target populations in Phase IB and Phase IIA, and thoroughly evaluated using randomized clinical trials in Phase IIB and Phase III. Successful completion of these phases should be the basis of determining whether computational models are useful tools for prognosis, diagnosis, or treatment of psychiatric patients.

conclusionsA new type of infrastructure will be necessary to implement the proposed pipeline. This infrastructure should consist of groups of investigators with diverse backgrounds collaborating to make computational psychiatry relevant for the clinic.

Indexed as

BiomarkersComputational psychiatryDevelopment pipelinesMachine LearningPredictionTranslational psychiatry

Identifiers

PMID28018986
PMCPMC5176268
OpenAlexW2346273735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.