ArticleCureus2016
Effect of Multidisciplinary Case Conferences on Physician Decision Making: Breast Diagnostic Rounds.
Article in Cureus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Impact of Tumor Boards on Breast Cancer Care: Evidence from a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- The requirements of a specialist breast centre.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Guideline
- Surgeon Alignment With Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Qualitative Analysis of Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary approach to cancer care in Rwanda: the role of tumour board meetings.Ecancermedicalscience · 2023Article
- A Web-Based Self-assessment Model for Evaluating Multidisciplinary Cancer Teams in Spain: Development and Validation Pilot Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Implementation of a multidisciplinary infections conference improves the treatment of spondylodiscitis.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- European Guidelines on the Organisation of Breast Centres and Voluntary Certification Processes.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Multidisciplinary care of breast cancer patients: a scoping review of multidisciplinary styles, processes, and outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019Article
- Multidisciplinary Lung Cancer Tumor Board Connecting Eight General Hospitals in Japan via a High-Security Communication Line.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2019Article
- Impact of GI Tumor Board on Patient Management and Adherence to Guidelines.Journal of global oncology · 2018Article
- Fostering Local Health Department and Health System Collaboration Through Case Conferences for At-Risk and Vulnerable Populations.American journal of public health · 2018Article
- Input of Psychosocial Information During Multidisciplinary Team Meetings at Medical Oncology Departments: Protocol for an Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the utility of multidisciplinary case conferences (MCCs) on physician decision making in benign and malignant breast disease management.
methodsPatients with interesting or challenging diagnostic or management issues were discussed at biweekly diagnostic breast MCCs. Prior to discussion, a clinical summary and intended management plan prior to the MCC was presented. For each case, diagnostic images/histopathology were centrally reviewed after which group discussion achieved a management consensus which was documented prospectively. Initial management plans were compared to the post-MCC consensus. A change in a management plan was defined as a consensus plan different from the pre-MCC plan or no definite plan prior to the MCC.
resultsFrom November 2014 to December 2015, 76 patients (43 malignant and 33 benign diagnoses) were discussed in 19 MCCs. All cases presented resulted in a consensus management recommendation. Thirty-one case discussions (41%) resulted in a changed management plan (20 malignant and 11 benign diagnoses). Management changes included avoidance of immediate surgery (9% of cases), change in the type of surgery (5%), non-invasive investigation to invasive/surgical intervention (7%), and detection of a new suspicious lesion (1%).
conclusionMCCs had a substantial impact on physician decision making. Management plans changed in 41% of cases presented, the majority due to new/clarified diagnostic information. Presentation of cases at MCCs should be encouraged, especially for challenging diagnostic or management issues regarding malignant or benign breast diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.