Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28018735›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2016

Using DRS during breast conserving surgery: identifying robust optical parameters and influence of inter-patient variation.

Lisanne L de Boer, Benno H W Hendriks, Frederieke van Duijnhoven, Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters-Baas, Koen Van de Vijver, Claudette E Loo, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Henricus J C M Sterenborg, Theo J M Ruers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lisanne L de BoerNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Benno H W HendriksPhilips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Biomechanical Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Frederieke van DuijnhovenNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters-BaasNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Koen Van de VijverNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Claudette E LooNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Katarzyna JóźwiakNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam The Netherlands.
Henricus J C M SterenborgNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam The Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Theo J M RuersNetherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam The Netherlands; MIRA Institute, University Twente, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Successful breast conserving surgery consists of complete removal of the tumor while sparing healthy surrounding tissue. Despite currently available imaging and margin assessment tools, recognizing tumor tissue at a resection margin during surgery is challenging. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), which uses light for tissue characterization, can potentially guide surgeons to prevent tumor positive margins. However, inter-patient variation and changes in tissue physiology occurring during the resection might hamper this light-based technology. Here we investigate how inter-patient variation and tissue status (

Indexed as

(060.2310) Fiber optics(170.6935) Tissue characterization(300.0300) Spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID28018735
PMCPMC5175562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.