ArticleJournal of eating disorders2016
Developing shared understandings of recovery and care: a qualitative study of women with eating disorders who resist therapeutic care.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond traditional models: a content analysis exploring the applicability of harm reduction in eating disorder care.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators to treatment in severe and enduring eating disorders: a mixed-methods study of access, engagement, and lived experience.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- "It's like building a new person": lived experience perspectives on eating disorder recovery processes.Journal of eating disorders · 2024Article
- Discordant conceptualisations of eating disorder recovery and their influence on the construct of terminality.Journal of eating disorders · 2024Article
- More than an outcome: a person-centered, ecological framework for eating disorder recovery.Journal of eating disorders · 2023Article
- A lived experience response to the proposed diagnosis of terminal anorexia nervosa: learning from iatrogenic harm, ambivalence and enduring hope.Journal of eating disorders · 2023Article
- Conceptualizing eating disorder recovery research: Current perspectives and future research directions.Journal of eating disorders · 2022Review
- An open invitation to productive conversations about feminism and the spectrum of eating disorders (part 2): Potential contributions to the science of diagnosis, treatment, and prevention.Journal of eating disorders · 2022Review
- Conceptualising specialist supportive clinical management (SSCM): current evidence and future directions.Journal of eating disorders · 2022Review
- Help-seeking attitudes and behaviours among youth with eating disorders: a scoping review.Journal of eating disorders · 2022Article
- Experiences of eating disorders from the perspectives of patients, family members and health care professionals: a meta-review of qualitative evidence syntheses.Journal of eating disorders · 2021Review
- Recovering Uncertainty: Exploring Eating Disorder Recovery in Context.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2021Article
- Embodiment as a Paradigm for Understanding and Treating SE-AN: Locating the Self in Culture.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
- René Girard and the Mimetic Nature of Eating Disorders.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis paper explores the differing perspectives of recovery and care of people with disordered eating. We consider the views of those who have not sought help for their disordered eating, or who have been given a diagnosis but have not engaged with health care services. Our aim is to demonstrate the importance of the cultural context of care and how this might shape people's perspectives of recovery and openness to receiving professional care.
methodThis study utilised a mixed methods approach of ethnographic fieldwork and psychological evaluation with 28 women from Adelaide, South Australia. Semi-structured interviews, observations, field notes and the Eating Disorder Examination were the primary forms of data collection. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: Participants in our study described how their disordered eating afforded them safety and were consistent with cultural values concerning healthy eating and gendered bodies. Disordered eating was viewed as a form of self-care, in which people protect and 'take care' of themselves. These subjectively experienced understandings of care underlie eating disorder behaviours and provide an obstacle in seeking any form of treatment that might lead to recovery.
conclusionA shared understanding between patients and health professionals about the function of the eating disorder may avoid conflict and provide a pathway to treatment. These results suggest the construction of care by patients should not be taken for granted in therapeutic guidelines. A discussion considering how disordered eating practices are embedded in a matrix of care, health, eating and body practices may enhance the therapeutic relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.