Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28018314›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016

Impact and Influence of the Natural

Mark J Mandel, Anne K Dunn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Host-Associated Biofilms:Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Overexpression ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Metataxonomic analysis of tissue-associated microbiota in grooved carpet-shell (Ruditapes decussatus) and Manila (Ruditapes philippinarum) clams.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genetic Manipulation of Vibrio fischeri.Current protocols in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. ThemSystems · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark J MandelDepartment of Microbiology-Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, IL, USA.
Anne K DunnDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma Norman, OK, USA.

Funding

Genetic Analysis of Beneficial Bacterial ColonizationR35GM119627 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MANDEL, MARK J · 2016 to 2021
$2.2M
Regulation of Bacterial Aggregation During Host ColonizationR21AI117262 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MANDEL, MARK J · 2016 to 2017
$408k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI117262NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals are colonized by bacteria, and in many cases partners have co-evolved to perform mutually beneficial functions. An exciting and ongoing legacy of the past decade has been an expansion of technology to enable study of natural associations

Indexed as

epithelial colonizationevolutioninvertebrate modelmarine microbiologymicrobiomesymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID28018314
PMCPMC5156696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.