Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28018298›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Do Bacterial "Virulence Factors" Always Increase Virulence? A Meta-Analysis of Pyoverdine Production in

Elisa T Granato, Freya Harrison, Rolf Kümmerli, Adin Ross-Gillespie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Quorum Sensing Inhibition by Sponge-AssociatedAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Iron acquisition strategies in pseudomonads: mechanisms, ecology, and evolution.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional Analysis of Hypothetical Proteins ofBioinformatics and biology insights · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Pyoverdine-Dependent Virulence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisa T GranatoDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.
Freya HarrisonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick Coventry, UK.
Rolf KümmerliDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.
Adin Ross-GillespieDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of ZurichZurich, Switzerland; SIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsLausanne, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial traits that contribute to disease are termed "virulence factors" and there is much interest in therapeutic approaches that disrupt such traits. What remains less clear is whether a virulence factor identified as such in a particular context is also important in infections involving different host and pathogen types. Here, we address this question using a meta-analytic approach. We statistically analyzed the infection outcomes of 81 experiments associated with one well-studied virulence factor-pyoverdine, an iron-scavenging compound secreted by the opportunistic pathogen

Indexed as

meta-analysispyoverdinesiderophorevirulencevirulence factor

Identifiers

PMID28018298
PMCPMC5149528
OpenAlexW2553382699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.