ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016
A Bidirectional Brain-Machine Interface Featuring a Neuromorphic Hardware Decoder.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards neuromorphic neurotechnologies: integrating brain-inspired computing with brain-computer interfaces.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Neural vs Neuromorphic Interfaces: Where Are We Standing?Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- Comparison metrics and power trade-offs for BCI motor decoding circuit design.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Review
- Application of Event Cameras and Neuromorphic Computing to VSLAM: A Survey.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Neuromorphic hardware for somatosensory neuroprostheses.Nature communications · 2024Review
- Artificial cerebellum on FPGA: realistic real-time cerebellar spiking neural network model capable of real-world adaptive motor control.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Current state of the art and future directions for implantable sensors in medical technology: Clinical needs and engineering challenges.APL bioengineering · 2023Review
- Adaptive STDP-based on-chip spike pattern detection.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- A Novel Quick-Response Eigenface Analysis Scheme for Brain-Computer Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Power-Efficient Brain-Machine Interface System With a Sub-mw Feature Extraction and Decoding ASIC Demonstrated in Nonhuman Primates.IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems · 2022Article
- Neurophysiological considerations for visual implants.Brain structure & function · 2022Review
- Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-Based Neural Interfaces for Recording and Stimulation: Fundamental Aspects and In Vivo Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Classification of Whisker Deflections From Evoked Responses in the Somatosensory Barrel Cortex With Spiking Neural Networks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Robust neuromorphic coupled oscillators for adaptive pacemakers.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A Nonlinear Maximum Correntropy Information Filter for High-Dimensional Neural Decoding.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- An Adaptive STDP Learning Rule for Neuromorphic Systems.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Multichannel parallel processing of neural signals in memristor arrays.Science advances · 2020Article
- Neurohybrid Memristive CMOS-Integrated Systems for Biosensors and Neuroprosthetics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Deep Learning With Spiking Neurons: Opportunities and Challenges.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Review
- State-Dependent Decoding Algorithms Improve the Performance of a Bidirectional BMI in Anesthetized Rats.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bidirectional brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) establish a two-way direct communication link between the brain and the external world. A decoder translates recorded neural activity into motor commands and an encoder delivers sensory information collected from the environment directly to the brain creating a closed-loop system. These two modules are typically integrated in bulky external devices. However, the clinical support of patients with severe motor and sensory deficits requires compact, low-power, and fully implantable systems that can decode neural signals to control external devices. As a first step toward this goal, we developed a modular bidirectional BMI setup that uses a compact neuromorphic processor as a decoder. On this chip we implemented a network of spiking neurons built using its ultra-low-power mixed-signal analog/digital circuits. On-chip on-line spike-timing-dependent plasticity synapse circuits enabled the network to learn to decode neural signals recorded from the brain into motor outputs controlling the movements of an external device. The modularity of the BMI allowed us to tune the individual components of the setup without modifying the whole system. In this paper, we present the features of this modular BMI and describe how we configured the network of spiking neuron circuits to implement the decoder and to coordinate it with the encoder in an experimental BMI paradigm that connects bidirectionally the brain of an anesthetized rat with an external object. We show that the chip learned the decoding task correctly, allowing the interfaced brain to control the object's trajectories robustly. Based on our demonstration, we propose that neuromorphic technology is mature enough for the development of BMI modules that are sufficiently low-power and compact, while being highly computationally powerful and adaptive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.