Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28018010›Full record

ReviewTransactions of the American Ophthalmological Society2016

Uveal Melanoma Cell Lines: Where do they come from? (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Martine J Jager, J Antonio Bermudez Magner, Bruce R Ksander, Sander R Dubovy

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The latestExpert opinion on drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. ZEB1 and Uveal Melanoma Invasiveness.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Allele-specific depletion ofMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martine J JagerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands (Dr Jager); Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Jager, Dr Ksander); Florida Lions Ocular Pathology Laboratory, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida (Dr Magner, Dr Dubovy); and Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico (Dr Magner).
J Antonio Bermudez MagnerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands (Dr Jager); Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Jager, Dr Ksander); Florida Lions Ocular Pathology Laboratory, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida (Dr Magner, Dr Dubovy); and Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico (Dr Magner).
Bruce R KsanderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands (Dr Jager); Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Jager, Dr Ksander); Florida Lions Ocular Pathology Laboratory, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida (Dr Magner, Dr Dubovy); and Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico (Dr Magner).
Sander R DubovyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands (Dr Jager); Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Jager, Dr Ksander); Florida Lions Ocular Pathology Laboratory, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida (Dr Magner, Dr Dubovy); and Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana, Mexico City, Mexico (Dr Magner).
Institute of Ophthalmology · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether some of the most often used uveal melanoma cell lines resemble their original tumor.

methodsAnalysis of the literature, patient charts, histopathology, mutations, chromosome status, HLA type, and expression of melanocyte markers on cell lines and their primary tumors. We examined five cell lines and the primary tumors from which they were derived.

resultsFour of the five examined primary tumors were unusual: one occupied the orbit, two were recurrences after prior irradiation, and one developed in an eye with a nevus of Ota. One cell line did not contain the GNA11 mutation, but it was present in the primary tumor. Three of the primary tumors had monosomy 3 (two of these lacked BAP1 expression); however, all five cell lines showed disomy 3 and BAP1 expression. All of the cell lines had gain of 8q. Two cell lines lacked expression of melanocyte markers, although these were present in the corresponding primary tumor.

conclusionsAll cell lines could be traced back to their original uveal melanoma. Four of the five primary tumors were unusual. Cell lines often differed from their primary tumor in chromosome status and melanocyte markers. However, their specific chromosome aberrations and capacity to continue proliferation characterize them as uveal melanoma cell lines.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorHumansMelanocytesMelanomaOphthalmologySocieties, MedicalUnited StatesUveal MelanomaUveal Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28018010
PMCPMC5161001
OpenAlexW2570152363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.