ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2016
Labour and Childbirth After Previous Caesarean Section: Recommendations of the Austrian Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (OEGGG).
Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- FIGO good practice recommendations for vaginal birth after cesarean section.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Guideline
- Successful Trial of Labor After Two Caesarean Sections (TOLA2C): Analysis of a Delivery Protocol with Feto-Maternal Outcome.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2025Article
- A Retrospective Analysis of the Robson Classification Implementation in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Serbia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Trial of labor after caesarean section in low risk pregnancies: is it risky?Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Cesarean section trends from 1992 to 2023 in Estonia among singleton term pregnancies: A registry-based study.European journal of midwifery · 2025Article
- The Experience of Women Giving Birth after Cesarean Section-A Longitudinal Observational Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after one lower uterine transverse cesarean section delivery.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Trial of labor after cesarean in women with hypertensive disorders and no prior vaginal delivery.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Article
- Methods of induction of labor after cesarean with no prior vaginal delivery-Perinatal outcomes.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023Article
- Sonographic fetal head circumference is associated with trial of labor after cesarean section success.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- Vaginal birth after caesarean section before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth.Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives · 2022Observational
- Cesarean Section Rate and Perinatal Outcome Analyses According to Robson's 10-Group Classification System.Maternal and child health journal · 2021Article
- Obstetricians' perspectives on trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) under the two-child policy in China: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- Misdiagnosis of a twin pregnancy with double-corner uterine rupture following salpingectomy and protrusion of the amniotic sac as an adnexal cyst: a case report.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Obstetric outcome of induction of labor using prostaglandin gel in patients with previous one cesarean section.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2019Article
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes for women giving birth after previous cesarean.European journal of midwifery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The new expert recommendation from the Austrian Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (OEGGG) comprises an interpretation and summary of guidelines from the leading specialist organisations worldwide (RCOG, ACOG, SOGC, CNGOF, WHO, NIH, NICE, UpToDate). In essence it outlines alternatives to the direct pathway to elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS). In so doing it aligns with international trends, according to which a differentiated, individualised clinical approach is recommended that considers benefits and risks to both mother and child, provides detailed counselling and takes the patient's wishes into account. In view of good success rates (60-85 %) for vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) the consideration of predictive factors during antenatal birth planning has become increasingly important. This publication provides a compact management recommendation for the majority of standard clinical situations. However it cannot and does not claim to cover all possible scenarios. The consideration of all relevant factors in each individual case, and thus the ultimate decision on mode of delivery, remains the discretion and responsibility of the treating obstetrician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.