Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28017647›Full record

ReviewExperimental hematology2017

Preclinical approaches in chronic myeloid leukemia: from cells to systems.

Cassie J Clarke, Tessa L Holyoake

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Genetic Biomarkers in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: What Have We Learned So Far?International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Normal Versus Malignant.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cassie J ClarkePaul O'Gorman Leukaemia Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Tessa L HolyoakePaul O'Gorman Leukaemia Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK. Electronic address: Tessa.Holyoake@glasgow.ac.uk.
Gartnavel General Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11008Medical Research Council G0600782Medical Research Council MC_PC_13063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in the design of targeted therapies for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have transformed the prognosis for patients diagnosed with this disease. However, leukemic stem cell persistence, drug intolerance, drug resistance, and advanced-phase disease represent unmet clinical needs demanding the attention of CML investigators worldwide. The availability of appropriate preclinical models is essential to efficiently translate findings from the bench to the clinic. Here we review the current approaches taken to preclinical work in the CML field, including examples of commonly used in vivo models and recent successes from systems biology-based methodologies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCell Line, TransformedCell TransplantationDisease Models, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveTransduction, GeneticTransgenesTumor Cells, CulturedXenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Identifiers

PMID28017647
PMCPMC5333535
OpenAlexW2567414578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.