Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28017431›Full record

ReviewVaccine2019

WHO consultation on group B Streptococcus vaccine development: Report from a meeting held on 27-28 April 2016.

Miwako Kobayashi, Stephanie J Schrag, Mark R Alderson, Shabir A Madhi, Carol J Baker, Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter Meulen, David C Kaslow, Peter G Smith, Vasee S Moorthy, Johan Vekemans

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Updates on Group BMicroorganisms · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Financial and Global Demand Analysis to Inform Decisions for Funding and Clinical Development of Group B Streptococcus Vaccines for Pregnant Women.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Miwako KobayashiNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Stephanie J SchragNational Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Division of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA.
Mark R AldersonCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.
Shabir A MadhiDepartment of Science and Technology/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, and Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Carol J BakerDepartment of Pediatrics, Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter MeulenBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
David C KaslowCenter for Vaccine Innovation and Access, PATH, Seattle, WA 98121, USA.
Peter G SmithMRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Vasee S MoorthyInitiative for Vaccine Research, World Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Johan VekemansInitiative for Vaccine Research, World Health Organization, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. Electronic address: vekemansj@who.int.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USProgram for Appropriate Technology in Health · USWorld Health Organization · CHBaylor College of Medicine · USBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBRespiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit · ZA

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, group B Streptococcus (GBS) remains a leading cause of sepsis and meningitis in infants in the first 90days of life. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) for women at increased risk of transmitting GBS to their newborns has been effective in reducing part, but not all, of the GBS disease burden in many high income countries (HICs). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), IAP use is low. Immunization of pregnant women with a GBS vaccine represents an alternative strategy to protecting newborns and young infants, through transplacental antibody transfer and potentially by reducing new vaginal colonization. This vaccination strategy was first suggested in the 1970s and several potential GBS vaccines have completed phase I/II clinical trials. During the 2015 WHO Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee meeting, GBS was identified as a high priority for the development of a vaccine for maternal immunization because of the major public health burden posed by GBS in LMICs, and the high technical feasibility for successful development. Following this meeting, the first WHO technical consultation on GBS vaccines was held on the 27th and 28th of April 2016, to consider development pathways for such vaccines, focused on their potential role in reducing newborn and young infant deaths and possibly stillbirths in LMICs. Discussion topics included: (1) pathophysiology of disease; (2) current gaps in the knowledge of global disease burden and serotype distribution; (3) vaccine candidates under development; (4) design considerations for phase III trials; and (5) pathways to licensure, policy recommendations and use. Efforts to address gaps identified in each of these areas are needed to establish the public health need for, the development and deployment of, efficacious GBS vaccines. In particular, more work is required to understand the global disease burden of GBS-associated stillbirths, and to develop quality-assured standardized antibody assays to identify correlates of protection.

Indexed as

AnimalsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousStillbirthStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcal VaccinesStreptococcus agalactiaeVaccinationWorld Health OrganizationStreptococcal VaccinesGroup B StreptococcusMaternal vaccinationPhase III trialVaccine licensure

Identifiers

PMID28017431
PMCPMC6892266
OpenAlexW2561215256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.