ReviewVaccine2019
WHO consultation on group B Streptococcus vaccine development: Report from a meeting held on 27-28 April 2016.
Review in Vaccine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rectal and Vaginal Eradication ofNutrients · 2019Trial
- The persistent challenge of meningitis in the vaccine era: a three-decade longitudinal analysis of residual burden in the United States.Infection · 2026Article
- Pregnant women's attitudes and intentions toward tuberculosis, malaria, group B streptococcus, and respiratory syncytial virus vaccines in pregnant: Findings from a cross-sectional study of pregnant women living in Brazil, Ghana, Kenya, and Pakistan.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Early-Onset Neonatal Infection and Epilepsy in Children.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Genotypic Distribution of Alpha-Like Proteins in Group BInfection & chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Vaccination for prevention of hearing loss: a scoping review.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Group B Streptococcus Infection and Obstetric Hemorrhage Risk.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Long-term healthcare utilisation, costs and quality of life after invasive group BBMJ global health · 2024Article
- Maternal Group B Streptococcus Infection Correlates Inversely With Preeclampsia in Pregnant African American Women.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Proof of concept for a single-dose Group B Streptococcus vaccine based on capsular polysaccharide conjugated to Qβ virus-like particles.NPJ vaccines · 2023Article
- Immune responses against group BiScience · 2023Article
- Updates on Group BMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- Development and evaluation of a multi-epitope subunit vaccine against group BEmerging microbes & infections · 2022Article
- Microbiological and clinical characteristics of invasive Group B Streptococcal blood stream infections in children and adults from Qatar.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- A Recombinant Alpha-Like Protein Subunit Vaccine (GBS-NN) Provides Protection in Murine Models of Group B Streptococcus Infection.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Toward the development of a protein-based group BCell reports. Medicine · 2022Article
- A Financial and Global Demand Analysis to Inform Decisions for Funding and Clinical Development of Group B Streptococcus Vaccines for Pregnant Women.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Globally, group B Streptococcus (GBS) remains a leading cause of sepsis and meningitis in infants in the first 90days of life. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) for women at increased risk of transmitting GBS to their newborns has been effective in reducing part, but not all, of the GBS disease burden in many high income countries (HICs). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), IAP use is low. Immunization of pregnant women with a GBS vaccine represents an alternative strategy to protecting newborns and young infants, through transplacental antibody transfer and potentially by reducing new vaginal colonization. This vaccination strategy was first suggested in the 1970s and several potential GBS vaccines have completed phase I/II clinical trials. During the 2015 WHO Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee meeting, GBS was identified as a high priority for the development of a vaccine for maternal immunization because of the major public health burden posed by GBS in LMICs, and the high technical feasibility for successful development. Following this meeting, the first WHO technical consultation on GBS vaccines was held on the 27th and 28th of April 2016, to consider development pathways for such vaccines, focused on their potential role in reducing newborn and young infant deaths and possibly stillbirths in LMICs. Discussion topics included: (1) pathophysiology of disease; (2) current gaps in the knowledge of global disease burden and serotype distribution; (3) vaccine candidates under development; (4) design considerations for phase III trials; and (5) pathways to licensure, policy recommendations and use. Efforts to address gaps identified in each of these areas are needed to establish the public health need for, the development and deployment of, efficacious GBS vaccines. In particular, more work is required to understand the global disease burden of GBS-associated stillbirths, and to develop quality-assured standardized antibody assays to identify correlates of protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.