Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28017179›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2017

Does mental status impact therapist and patient communication in emergency department brief interventions addressing alcohol use?

Brian Borsari, Timothy R Apodaca, Ali Yurasek, Peter M Monti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian BorsariMental Health Service (116B), San Francisco VA Medical Center, 4150 Clement St., San Francisco, CA 94121; Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, and Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box G-S121-4, Providence, RI 02912; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, 401 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143. Electronic address: Brian.Borsari.sfva.ucsf@gmail.com.
Timothy R ApodacaChildren's Mercy Kansas City, 2401 Gillham Rd., Kansas City, MO, 64108; University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66103.
Ali YurasekDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, and Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box G-S121-4, Providence, RI 02912.
Peter M MontiDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, and Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box G-S121-4, Providence, RI 02912.
Brown University · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING FOR ETOH+ TEENS IN THE ERR01AA009892 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 1994 to 2014
$8.3M
Within-Session Mechanisms of Behavior Change in At-Risk College StudentsR01AA017427 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BORSARI, BRIAN · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
Advancing a Bio-Psycho-Social Alcohol Treatment Research and Mentoring ProgramK05AA019681 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
Identifying Mechanisms of Motivational InterviewingK23AA015595 · NIAAA · CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSP (KANSAS CITY, MO) · PI APODACA, TIMOTHY R · 2005 to 2009
$721k
NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA019681NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA015595NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA009892NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivational interviewing (MI) is often incorporated into screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) interventions in critical care settings to address alcohol and other drug use. However, cognitive status has been linked to differential response to MI sessions in emergency department (ED) settings. The current study examined one possible explanation for this differential response: whether higher versus lower mental status impacts patient response to clinician statements during MI sessions conducted in an ED. Participants were 126 patients receiving an MI-based single-session alcohol brief intervention, and 13 therapists who provided treatment. Participants completed a mental status exam (MSE) as part of the screening process. Intervention sessions were audio-taped, and transcribed and coded using the Motivational Interviewing Skills Code (MISC 2.0; Miller, Moyers, Ernst, & Amrhein, 2003). The MISC 2.0 coded therapist behaviors that are related to the use of motivational interviewing, and patient language reflecting movement toward (change talk) or away from (sustain talk) changing personal alcohol use. Overall, patients responded in a similar manner to therapist MI behaviors regardless of high versus low level of mental functioning at the time of the intervention. Group differences emerged on patient response to only three specific therapist skills: giving information, open questions, and complex reflection. Thus, the differential effects of SBIRT in critical care settings do not appear to be a result of differences in the therapist and patient communication process.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareProfessional-Patient RelationsTrauma CentersWounds and InjuriesAdultAlcohol-Related DisordersCognitive DysfunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivational InterviewingAlcohol useBrief interventionEmergency departmentsMental statusMotivational interviewing

Identifiers

PMID28017179
PMCPMC5193232
OpenAlexW2529890741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.