Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28013455›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2017

Laparoscopic appendectomy: Hem-o-lok versus Endoloop in stump closure.

Andrea Lucchi, Pierluigi Berti, Michele Grassia, Luca Maria Siani, Carlo Gabbianelli, Gianluca Garulli

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of three different methods for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy: Endoloop, Hem-o-lok clip, and endostapler.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea LucchiAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, General and Thoracic Surgery Unit, Ceccarini Hospital, Viale Frosinone, 47838, Riccione, RN, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1688-3958
Pierluigi BertiAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, General and Thoracic Surgery Unit, Ceccarini Hospital, Viale Frosinone, 47838, Riccione, RN, Italy.
Michele GrassiaAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, General and Thoracic Surgery Unit, Ceccarini Hospital, Viale Frosinone, 47838, Riccione, RN, Italy.
Luca Maria SianiAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, General and Thoracic Surgery Unit, Ceccarini Hospital, Viale Frosinone, 47838, Riccione, RN, Italy.
Carlo GabbianelliAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, General and Thoracic Surgery Unit, Ceccarini Hospital, Viale Frosinone, 47838, Riccione, RN, Italy.
Gianluca GarulliAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale della Romagna, General and Thoracic Surgery Unit, Ceccarini Hospital, Viale Frosinone, 47838, Riccione, RN, Italy. lucchi.andrea@gmail.com.
Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are several techniques described to close the appendicular stump during laparoscopic appendectomy. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and usefulness of the Hem-o-lok clip for the closure of appendicular stump, comparing these data with those concerning the endo-loop. We conducted a retrospective study that compared two groups of patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from 2010 to 2015 at our institution. We used the Endoloop to close the stump in the first group (group I) and the Hem-o-lok in the second group (group II). We reviewed patient's data including: complications, operative time, length of stay, costs. There were 121 patients in group I and 138 patients in group II. The mean operative times were 40.5 min in group I and 36.4 min in the group II. No intraoperative complications and no mortality were observed in either group. The mean postoperative length of hospital stay was similar for both groups. There was no rehospitalization after discharge. The complication rate did not reach statistical significance between the groups. The cost of the procedure using the Hem-o-lok has been lower than using the Endoloop. Both the Endoloop and Hem-o-lok are safe for the closure of the appendicular stump. Hem-o-lok appears to be superior than Endoloop in terms of easeness of use and cheapness, maintaining the same safety.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAppendectomyCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesAppendicitisAppendicular stumpClipEndoloopHem-o-lokLaparoscopic appendectomy

Identifiers

PMID28013455
OpenAlexW2564003456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.