Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28013351›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2017

Differential effects of aprepitant, a clinically used neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist on the expression of conditioned psychostimulant versus opioid reward.

Padmanabhan Mannangatti, Santhanalakshmi Sundaramurthy, Sammanda Ramamoorthy, Lankupalle D Jayanthi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Padmanabhan MannangattiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Santhanalakshmi SundaramurthyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Sammanda RamamoorthyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Lankupalle D JayanthiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA. lankupalle.jayanthi@vcuhealth.org.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Kappa-Opioid Receptor Mediated Regulation of Dopamine TransportR01MH083928 · NIMH · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI RAMAMOORTHY, SAMMANDA · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
Does neurokinin-1 modulate amphetamine reward via catecholamine transport?R21DA039451 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI JAYANTHI, LANKUPALLE D · 2016 to 2017
$419k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA039451NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleNeurokinin-1 receptor (NK1R) signaling modulates behaviors associated with psychostimulants and opioids. Psychostimulants, such as amphetamine (AMPH) and cocaine, bind to monoamine transporters and alter their functions. Both dopamine and norepinephrine transporters are regulated by NK1R activation suggesting a role for NK1R mediated catecholamine transporter regulation in psychostimulant-mediated behaviors.

objectivesThe effect of in vivo administration of aprepitant (10 mg/kg) on the expression of AMPH (0.5 and 2 mg/kg) and cocaine (5 and 20 mg/kg)-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) as well as locomotor activation was examined in C57BL/6J mice. The effect of aprepitant on morphine (1 and 5 mg/kg)-induced CPP was also examined to identify the specific actions of aprepitant on psychostimulant versus opioid-induced behaviors.

resultsAprepitant administration significantly attenuated the CPP expression and locomotor activation produced by AMPH and cocaine. In contrast, aprepitant significantly enhanced the expression of CPP produced by morphine while significantly suppressing the locomotor activity of the mice conditioned with morphine. Aprepitant by itself did not induce significant CPP or conditioned place aversion or locomotor activation or suppression.

conclusionsAttenuation of AMPH or cocaine-induced CPP and locomotor activation by aprepitant suggests a role for NK1R signaling in psychostimulant-mediated behaviors. Stimulation of morphine-induced CPP expression and suppression of locomotor activity of morphine-conditioned mice suggest differential effects of NK1R antagonism on conditioned psychostimulant versus opioid reward. Collectively, these findings indicate that clinically used NK1R antagonist, aprepitant may serve as a potential therapeutic agent in the treatment of psychostimulant abuse.

Indexed as

RewardAmphetamineAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsAprepitantAssociation LearningCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineConditioning, PsychologicalLocomotionMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMorphineMorpholinesMotor ActivityAmphetamineAnalgesics, OpioidAprepitantCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineMorphineMorpholinesNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsAmphetamineAntagonistAprepitantCocaineConditioned place preferenceDrug abuseMorphineNeurokinin-1 receptorOpioidsPsychostimulants

Identifiers

PMID28013351
PMCPMC5266628
OpenAlexW2566858920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.