ArticleDevelopmental biology2017
Tissue specific regulation of the chick Sox10E1 enhancer by different Sox family members.
Article in Developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neural crest gene regulatory networks as drivers of development, diversification and disease.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026Review
- Stage-dependent differential gene expression profiles of cranial neural crest-like cells derived from mouse-induced pluripotent stem cells.Medical molecular morphology · 2020Article
- A genome-wide assessment of the ancestral neural crest gene regulatory network.Nature communications · 2019Article
- The molecular basis of neural crest axial identity.Developmental biology · 2018Review
- Transcriptome dataset of trunk neural crest cells migrating along the ventral pathway of chick embryos.Data in brief · 2018Article
- Regulatory Logic Underlying Diversification of the Neural Crest.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The transcription factor Sox10 is a key regulator of vertebrate neural crest development and serves crucial functions in the differentiation of multiple neural crest lineages. In the chick neural crest, two cis-regulatory elements have been identified that mediate Sox10 expression: Sox10E2, which initiates expression in cranial neural crest; Sox10E1 driving expression in vagal and trunk neural crest. Both also mediate Sox10 expression in the otic placode. Here, we have dissected and analyzed the Sox10E1 enhancer element to identify upstream regulatory inputs. Via mutational analysis, we found two critical Sox sites with differential impact on trunk versus otic Sox10E1 mediated reporter expression. Mutation of a combined SoxD/E motif was sufficient to completely abolish neural crest but not ear enhancer activity. However, mutation of both the SoxD/E and another SoxE site eliminated otic Sox10E1 expression. Loss-of-function experiments reveal Sox5 and Sox8 as critical inputs for trunk neural crest enhancer activity, but only Sox8 for its activity in the ear. Finally, we show by ChIP and co-immunoprecipitation that Sox5 directly binds to the SoxD/E site, and that it can interact with Sox8, further supporting their combinatorial role in activation of Sox10E1 in the trunk neural crest. The results reveal important tissue-specific inputs into Sox10 expression in the developing embryo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.