Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28012327›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2017

Incarcerated and eventrated abdominal wall hernia reconstruction with autologous double-layer dermal graft in the field of purulent peritonitis-A case report.

Gábor Martis, Máté Rózsahegyi, János Deák, László Damjanovich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gábor MartisUniversity of Debrecen, Clinical and Health Science Center, Department of Surgery, Debrecen, 4032, Móricz Zsigmond út 22, Hungary. Electronic address: gabor6911@gmail.com.
Máté RózsahegyiUniversity of Debrecen, Clinical and Health Science Center, Department of Surgery, Debrecen, 4032, Móricz Zsigmond út 22, Hungary.
János DeákUniversity of Debrecen, Clinical and Health Science Center, Department of Surgery, Debrecen, 4032, Móricz Zsigmond út 22, Hungary.
László DamjanovichUniversity of Debrecen, Clinical and Health Science Center, Department of Surgery, Debrecen, 4032, Móricz Zsigmond út 22, Hungary.
University of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDouble-layer dermal grafts are used for the management of complicated abdominal wall hernias in obese, high risk patients. The method has not yet been used in case of emergency in septic/dirty environment. CASE REPORT: A 76-year old female patient (BMI 36.7kg/m DISCUSSION: Abdominal wall reconstruction was possible in a necrotic, purulent environment by using a de-epithelised autologous double layer dermal graft, without synthetic or biological graft implantation. The advantage of the procedure was cost-effectivity, and the disadvantage was that only in an obese patient is the sufficient quantity of dermal graft available.

conclusionA homogeneous internal and perforated outer dermal graft was suitable for bridging the abdominal gap in the case of an obese, high risk patient. Autologous dermal grafts can be a safe and feasible alternative to biological meshes in emergency abdominal wall surgeries. Evaluation of a case series can be the next cornerstone of the method described above.

Indexed as

Case reportDirty woundDouble-layer dermal graftEventrated herniaIncarcerated herniaLow tension reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID28012327
PMCPMC5192031
OpenAlexW2560774859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.