Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28012154›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2017

Mass spectrometry comparison of nerve allograft decellularization processes.

Alonda C Pollins, Justine S Kim, Richard B Boyer, Wesley P Thayer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alonda C PollinsDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Alonda.c.pollins@vanderbilt.edu.
Justine S KimVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Richard B BoyerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Wesley P ThayerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peripheral nerve repair using nerve grafts has been investigated for several decades using traditional techniques such as histology, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. Recent advances in mass spectrometry techniques have made it possible to study the proteomes of complex tissues, including extracellular matrix rich tissues similar to peripheral nerves. The present study comparatively assessed three previously described processing methods for generating acellular nerve grafts by mass spectrometry. Acellular nerve grafts were additionally examined by F-actin staining and nuclear staining for debris clearance. Application of newer techniques allowed us to detect and highlight differences among the 3 treatments. Isolated proteins were separated by mass on polyacrylamide gels serving 2 purposes. This further illustrated that these treatments differ from one another and it allowed for selective protein extractions within specific bands/molecular weights. This approach resulted in small pools of proteins that could then be analyzed by mass spectrometry for content. In total, 543 proteins were identified, many of which corroborate previous findings for these processing methods. The remaining proteins are novel discoveries that expand the field. With this pilot study, we have proven that mass spectrometry techniques complement and add value to peripheral nerve repair studies.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryNerve RegenerationActinsAllograftsAnimalsCell NucleusElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelExtracellular MatrixFemaleImmunohistochemistryMicroscopy, ElectronMolecular WeightNeuronsPeripheral Nervous SystemPilot ProjectsRatsActins

Identifiers

PMID28012154
OpenAlexW2562731601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.