ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2017
Mass spectrometry comparison of nerve allograft decellularization processes.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing Processed Nerve Allografts and Assessing Their Capacity to Retain and Release Nerve Growth Factor.Annals of plastic surgery · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral nerve repair using nerve grafts has been investigated for several decades using traditional techniques such as histology, immunohistochemistry, and electron microscopy. Recent advances in mass spectrometry techniques have made it possible to study the proteomes of complex tissues, including extracellular matrix rich tissues similar to peripheral nerves. The present study comparatively assessed three previously described processing methods for generating acellular nerve grafts by mass spectrometry. Acellular nerve grafts were additionally examined by F-actin staining and nuclear staining for debris clearance. Application of newer techniques allowed us to detect and highlight differences among the 3 treatments. Isolated proteins were separated by mass on polyacrylamide gels serving 2 purposes. This further illustrated that these treatments differ from one another and it allowed for selective protein extractions within specific bands/molecular weights. This approach resulted in small pools of proteins that could then be analyzed by mass spectrometry for content. In total, 543 proteins were identified, many of which corroborate previous findings for these processing methods. The remaining proteins are novel discoveries that expand the field. With this pilot study, we have proven that mass spectrometry techniques complement and add value to peripheral nerve repair studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.