Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28012116›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2017

Serum Chromogranin A as a Complementary Marker for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer-Specific Survival.

Christian Niedworok, Stephan Tschirdewahn, Henning Reis, Nils Lehmann, Miklós Szücs, Péter Nyirády, Imre Romics, Herbert Rübben, Tibor Szarvas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christian NiedworokDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stephan TschirdewahnDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Henning ReisInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Nils LehmannInstitute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Miklós SzücsDepartment of Urology, Semmelweis University, Üllöi út 78/b, Budapest, 1082, Hungary.
Péter NyirádyDepartment of Urology, Semmelweis University, Üllöi út 78/b, Budapest, 1082, Hungary.
Imre RomicsDepartment of Urology, Semmelweis University, Üllöi út 78/b, Budapest, 1082, Hungary.
Herbert RübbenDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Tibor SzarvasDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany. sztibusz@gmail.com.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DESemmelweis University · HUEssen University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Better prognostication of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCA) is urgently needed. Former studies using different study end-points provided controversial results regarding the prognostic value of serum chromogranin A (CGA) in clinically localized PCA. However, serum CGA was not tested for correlation with the most significant study end-point of long-term disease-specific survival (DSS). CGA and matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP7) levels were measured by the BRAHMS KRYPTOR in two independent patient groups with 127 serum and 110 plasma samples. CGA and MMP7 concentrations were correlated with clinicopathological and survival data. In addition, we tested the combinations of CGA with PSA and with a currently identified prognostic factor, MMP7, for their prognostic value. CGA concentrations were significantly elevated in advanced compared to clinically localized cases both in serum and plasma samples (45 vs. 23 ng/ml, p < 0.001 and; 41 vs. 22 ng/ml; p = 0.002 respectively). In accordance, high CGA levels were correlated with poor DSS. In clinically localized cases, CGA levels alone were not prognostic, but its dichotomized combinations with PSA or MMP7 were independently associated with DSS (HR: 4.88, 95% CI: 1.35-17.71, p = 0.016, HR: 7.46, 1.65-33.63, p = 0.009, respectively). Elevated serum CGA levels in progressed PCA and its prognostic value suggest a potential for CGA in disease monitoring. Our results revealed no independent prognostic value for CGA as a single serum marker in clinically localized cases. However, when combining with PSA or MMP7, CGA may improve both marker's performance in distinguishing between clinically significant and indolent PCAs.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorChromogranin AHumansMaleMatrix Metalloproteinase 7PrognosisProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorChromogranin AMatrix Metalloproteinase 7Prostate-Specific AntigenCGAChromogranin AKRYPTORPrognosisProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID28012116
OpenAlexW2561171916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.