Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28012055›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2017

Childhood versus adult-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: long-term outcome and predictors of mortality.

Alimohammad Fatemi, Mohammad Matinfar, Abbas Smiley

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The inequity of global healthcare in pediatric rheumatology.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2024
    Review
  5. Does the esv3587290 Copy Number Variation in theChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Kidney outcomes for children with lupus nephritis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alimohammad FatemiDepartment of Rheumatology, Alzahra Hospital, Sofe Street, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. a_fatemi@med.mui.ac.ir.
Mohammad MatinfarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Alzahra Hospital, Sofe Street, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Abbas SmileyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Alzahra Medical and Education Center · IRIndiana University Bloomington · USIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare survival of childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (c-SLE) and adult-onset SLE (a-SLE) according to initial manifestations. This was a retrospective cohort study. All patients were categorized into c-SLE (≤18 years) and a-SLE (>18 years). The clinical and serological data at the time of diagnosis were recorded and compared. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare survival rates between the two groups. Predictors of mortality were obtained by a backward Cox regression. One hundred eighty patients with c-SLE and 394 patients with a-SLE were enrolled. The female/male ratio was higher in c-SLE (P = 0.0001). Lupus nephritis (P = 0.002) and valvular heart disease (P = 0.025) were more common in c-SLE and a-SLE, respectively. In a 23-year follow-up, 20 patients (11.1%) with c-SLE and 35 patients (8.9%) with a-SLE died. Mortality was not significantly different between them (P = 0.4). The main causes of death were nephritis (50% in c-SLE vs. 29% in a-SLE), infections (40% in c-SLE vs. 29% in a-SLE), and circulatory disease (10% in c-SLE vs. 37% in a-SLE). The difference was not significant (P = 0.08). Cumulative survival rates after 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 91, 87, 85, and 78% in c-SLE and 93, 90, 90, and 83% in a-SLE, respectively. By multivariate analysis, seizure, proteinuria, and nephritis in c-SLE and seizure, hematuria, and pericarditis in a-SLE had negative prognostic effect on survival. Both c-SLE and a-SLE patients with seizure or renal involvement should be monitored more carefully to prevent ominous outcomes.

Indexed as

Age of OnsetAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMalePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdultChildrenOutcomeSurvivalSystematic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID28012055
OpenAlexW2562363295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.