ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2017
Study of the union method of microelectrode array and AFM for the recording of electromechanical activities in living cardiomyocytes.
Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanotechnology meets medicine: applications of atomic force microscopy in disease.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Force versus Response: Methods for Activating and Characterizing Mechanosensitive Ion Channels and GPCRs.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Single-Cell Analysis of Contractile Forces in iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes: Paving the Way for Precision Medicine in Cardiovascular Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Microengineered platforms for characterizing the contractile function of in vitro cardiac models.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2022Review
- Volcano-Shaped Scanning Probe Microscopy Probe for Combined Force-Electrogram Recordings from Excitable Cells.Nano letters · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrophysiology and mechanics are two essential components in the functions of cardiomyocytes and skeletal muscle cells. The simultaneous recording of electrophysiological and mechanical activities is important for the understanding of mechanisms underlying cell functions. For example, on the one hand, mechanisms under cardiovascular drug effects will be investigated in a comprehensive way by the simultaneous recording of electrophysiological and mechanical activities. On the other hand, computational models of electromechanics provide a powerful tool for the research of cardiomyocytes. The electrical and mechanical activities are important in cardiomyocyte models. The simultaneous recording of electrophysiological and mechanical activities can provide much experimental data for the models. Therefore, an efficient method for the simultaneous recording of the electrical and mechanical data from cardiomyocytes is required for the improvement of cardiac modeling. However, as far as we know, most of the previous methods were not easy to be implemented in the electromechanical recording. For this reason, in this study, a union method of microelectrode array and atomic force microscope was proposed. With this method, the extracellular field potential and beating force of cardiomyocytes were recorded simultaneously with a low root-mean-square noise level of 11.67 μV and 60 pN. Drug tests were conducted to verify the feasibility of the experimental platform. The experimental results suggested the method would be useful for the cardiovascular drug screening and refinement of the computational cardiomyocyte models. It may be valuable for exploring the functional mechanisms of cardiomyocytes and skeletal muscle cells under physiological or pathological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28012038What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.