Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28011832›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2016

A feasibility study of arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction.

Dongdong Deng, Hermenegild J Arevalo, Adityo Prakosa, David J Callans, Natalia A Trayanova

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 25 years of basic and translational science in EP Europace: novel insights into arrhythmia mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on risk assessment in cardiac arrhythmias: use the right tool for the right outcome, in the right population.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dongdong DengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Hackerman 216, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Hermenegild J ArevaloDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Hackerman 216, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Adityo PrakosaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Hackerman 216, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
David J CallansDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Electrophysiology Section, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, 9 Founders Pavillion, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Natalia A TrayanovaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Hackerman 216, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA ntrayanova@jhu.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Virtual Electrophysiology LaboratoryDP1HL123271 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYANOVA, NATALIA A. · 2013 to 2017
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS DP1 HL123271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo predict arrhythmia susceptibility in myocardial infarction (MI) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)  >35% using a personalized virtual heart simulation approach. METHODS AND

resultsA total of four contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets of patient hearts with MI and average LVEF of 44.0 ± 2.6% were used in this study. Because of the preserved LVEF, the patients were not indicated for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) insertion. One patient had spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) prior to the MRI scan; the others had no arrhythmic events. Simulations of arrhythmia susceptibility were blind to clinical outcome. Models were constructed from patient MRI images segmented to identify myocardium, grey zone, and scar based on pixel intensity. Grey zone was modelled as having altered electrophysiology. Programmed electrical stimulation (PES) was performed to assess VT inducibility from 19 bi-ventricular sites in each heart model. Simulations successfully predicted arrhythmia risk in all four patients. For the patient with arrhythmic event, in-silico PES resulted in VT induction. Simulations correctly predicted that VT was non-inducible for the three patients with no recorded VT events.

conclusionsResults demonstrate that the personalized virtual heart simulation approach may provide a novel risk stratification modality to non-invasively and effectively identify patients with LVEF  >35% who could benefit from ICD implantation.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularPatient-Specific ModelingStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAction PotentialsAdultArrhythmias, CardiacCardiac Pacing, ArtificialElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacFeasibility StudiesFemaleHeart Conduction SystemHeart RateHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedComputational modellingEjection fraction >35%Myocardial infarctionPersonalized virtual heartVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID28011832
PMCPMC5225965
OpenAlexW2562065425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.