Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28011450›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Statistical controversies in clinical research: early-phase adaptive design for combination immunotherapies.

N A Wages, C L Slingluff, G R Petroni

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Implementation of a Model-Based Design in a Phase Ib Study of Combined Targeted Agents.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N A WagesDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Division of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
C L SlingluffDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
G R PetroniDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Division of Translational Research & Applied Statistics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Thomas P. Loughran · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
Designs for phase I trials of combinations of agentsR01CA142859 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI CONAWAY, MARK R · 2010 to 2017
$2.1M
MELANOMA VACCINE FOR HELPER T CELLS COMBINED WITH TARGETED OR IMMUNE THERAPIESR01CA178846 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SLINGLUFF, CRAIG LEE · 2015 to 2017
$1.2M
Phase I Designs for Combined Immunotherapies in CancerK25CA181638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI WAGES, NOLAN · 2014 to 2018
$780k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA181638NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142859NCI NIH HHS R01 CA178846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, investigators have asserted that the 3 + 3 design lacks flexibility, making its use in modern early-phase trial settings, such as combinations and/or biological agents, inefficient. More innovative approaches are required to address contemporary research questions, such as those posed in trials involving immunotherapies. Design: We describe the implementation of an adaptive design for identifying an optimal treatment regimen, defined by low toxicity and high immune response, in an early-phase trial of a melanoma helper peptide vaccine plus novel adjuvant combinations. Results: Operating characteristics demonstrate the ability of the method to effectively recommend optimal regimens in a high percentage of trials with reasonable sample sizes. Conclusions: The proposed design is a practical, early-phase, adaptive method for use with combined immunotherapy regimens. This design can be applied more broadly to early-phase combination studies, as it was used in an ongoing study of two small molecule inhibitors in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

Indexed as

Statistics as TopicAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomedical ResearchCancer VaccinesHumansMelanomaResearch DesignAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigens, NeoplasmCancer Vaccinesclinical trialscombinationearly-phaseimmunotherapymelanoma

Identifiers

PMID28011450
PMCPMC5834099
OpenAlexW2563181471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.