Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28011436›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2017

Phonological abilities in literacy-impaired children: Brain potentials reveal deficient phoneme discrimination, but intact prosodic processing.

Claudia Männel, Gesa Schaadt, Franziska K Illner, Elke van der Meer, Angela D Friederici

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07003048 (Life vs. Digital Music Interventions Performed by Professionals Throughout Pregnancy to Increase Mental Health for Mothers and Their Offspring), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07003048 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Life vs. Digital Music Interventions Performed by Professionals Throughout Pregnancy to Increase Mental Health for Mothers and Their Offspring

TypeinterventionalSponsorClara Angela FoundationRan2025 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsPregnancy, Mental Health, Maternal and Child Health OutcomesArmsSinging, dancing in small groups and active listening to live music at the Berlin Philharmony building
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia MännelMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: maennel@cbs.mpg.de.
Gesa SchaadtMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
Franziska K IllnerDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
Elke van der MeerDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
Angela D FriedericiMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intact phonological processing is crucial for successful literacy acquisition. While individuals with difficulties in reading and spelling (i.e., developmental dyslexia) are known to experience deficient phoneme discrimination (i.e., segmental phonology), findings concerning their prosodic processing (i.e., suprasegmental phonology) are controversial. Because there are no behavior-independent studies on the underlying neural correlates of prosodic processing in dyslexia, these controversial findings might be explained by different task demands. To provide an objective behavior-independent picture of segmental and suprasegmental phonological processing in impaired literacy acquisition, we investigated event-related brain potentials during passive listening in typically and poor-spelling German school children. For segmental phonology, we analyzed the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) during vowel length discrimination, capturing automatic auditory deviancy detection in repetitive contexts. For suprasegmental phonology, we analyzed the Closure Positive Shift (CPS) that automatically occurs in response to prosodic boundaries. Our results revealed spelling group differences for the MMN, but not for the CPS, indicating deficient segmental, but intact suprasegmental phonological processing in poor spellers. The present findings point towards a differential role of segmental and suprasegmental phonology in literacy disorders and call for interventions that invigorate impaired literacy by utilizing intact prosody in addition to training deficient phonemic awareness.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentLiteracyPhoneticsAuditory PerceptionAwarenessBrainChildChild DevelopmentDiscrimination LearningDyslexiaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleReadingClosure positive shift (CPS)LiteracyMismatch negativity (MMN)PhonologyProsody

Identifiers

PMID28011436
PMCPMC6987698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.