Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28011244›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions2017

Predicting readmission risk following percutaneous coronary intervention at the time of admission.

Zaher Fanari, Daniel Elliott, Carla A Russo, Paul Kolm, William S Weintraub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zaher FanariSection of Cardiology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE; Division of Cardiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine. Electronic address: zfanari@gmail.com.
Daniel ElliottDepartment of Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE; Value Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.
Carla A RussoValue Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.
Paul KolmValue Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.
William S WeintraubSection of Cardiology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE; Value Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.

Funding

Subproject Title: Clinical Research Education, Mentoring and Career Development CoreU54GM104941 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI Gregory E Hicks · 2013 to 2026
$60.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether a prediction model based on data available early in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) admission can predict the risk of readmission.

backgroundReducing readmissions following hospitalization is a national priority. Identifying patients at high risk for readmission after PCI early in a hospitalization would enable hospitals to enhance discharge planning.

methodsWe developed 3 different models to predict 30-day inpatient readmission to our institution for patients who underwent PCI between January 2010 and April 2013. These models used data available: 1) at admission, 2) at discharge 3) from CathPCI Registry data. We used logistic regression and assessed the discrimination of each model using the c-index. The models were validated with testing on a different patient cohort who underwent PCI between May 2013 and September 2015.

resultsOur cohort included 6717 PCI patients; 3739 in the derivation cohort and 2978 in the validation cohort. The discriminative ability of the admission model was good (C-index of 0.727). The c-indices for the discharge and cath PCI models were slightly better. (C-index of 0.751 and 0.752 respectively). Internal validation of the models showed a reasonable discriminative admission model with slight improvement with adding discharge and registry data (C-index of 0.720, 0.739 and 0.741 respectively). Similarly validation of the models on the validation cohort showed similar results (C-index of 0.703, 0.725 and 0.719 respectively).

conclusionSimple models based on available demographic and clinical data may be sufficient to identify patients at highest risk of readmission following PCI early in their hospitalization.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRegistriesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomePercutaneous coronary interventionReadmissionRisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID28011244
PMCPMC5494278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.