ArticlePreventive veterinary medicine2017
Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession.
Article in Preventive veterinary medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Public acceptance of policy measures to prevent and combat infectious diseases in pets: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Pooled it
- Epidemiological and Clinical Insights from 68 Veterinarian-Reported Cases of Feline Infectious Peritonitis During the Documented FIP Epizootic in Cyprus.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Participation of livestock farmers and community animal health workers in one health intervention to control zoonotic diseases in Rwanda: a qualitative study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Can the epidemiology of zoonotic disease be studied in routine health records? A feasibility study of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Assessing Zoonotic Disease Exposure and Occupational Health and Safety Practices Among Veterinary Services Fieldworkers in North West Province, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Animal Health Professionals' Knowledge, Risk Perception and Preventive Practices Towards Zoonotic Infections in Cameroon.Public health challenges · 2025Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with occupational hazard exposure among undergraduate veterinary students in Bangladesh.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Zoonotic infections in UK and Irish veterinary students: a cross-sectional survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Risk Factors forVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Zoonotic diseases risk perception and infection prevention and control practices among poultry farmers in the Buea Health District, Cameroon: A one health perspective.Veterinary world · 2022Article
- Brucellosis in India: Comparing exposure amongst veterinarians, para-veterinarians and animal handlers.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Veterinarians as a Risk Group for Zoonoses: Exposure, Knowledge and Protective Practices in Finland.Safety and health at work · 2022Article
- [Zoonoses and occupational health in the veterinary profession].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2018Review
- Establishing research priorities to improve the One Health efficacy of Australian general practitioners and veterinarians with regard to zoonoses: A modified Delphi survey.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Article
- Assessing COVID-19 Pandemic Risk Perception and Response Preparedness in Veterinary and Animal Care Workers.Health securityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In human and veterinary medicine, reducing the risk of occupationally-acquired infections relies on effective infection prevention and control practices (IPCs). In veterinary medicine, zoonoses present a risk to practitioners, yet little is known about how these risks are understood and how this translates into health protective behaviour. This study aimed to explore risk perceptions within the British veterinary profession and identify motivators and barriers to compliance with IPCs. A cross-sectional study was conducted using veterinary practices registered with the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. Here we demonstrate that compliance with IPCs is influenced by more than just knowledge and experience, and understanding of risk is complex and multifactorial. Out of 252 respondents, the majority were not concerned about the risk of zoonoses (57.5%); however, a considerable proportion (34.9%) was. Overall, 44.0% of respondents reported contracting a confirmed or suspected zoonoses, most frequently dermatophytosis (58.6%). In veterinary professionals who had previous experience of managing zoonotic cases, time or financial constraints and a concern for adverse animal reactions were not perceived as barriers to use of personal protective equipment (PPE). For those working in large animal practice, the most significant motivator for using PPE was concerns over liability. When assessing responses to a range of different "infection control attitudes", veterinary nurses tended to have a more positive perspective, compared with veterinary surgeons. Our results demonstrate that IPCs are not always adhered to, and factors influencing motivators and barriers to compliance are not simply based on knowledge and experience. Educating veterinary professionals may help improve compliance to a certain extent, however increased knowledge does not necessarily equate to an increase in risk-mitigating behaviour. This highlights that the construction of risk is complex and circumstance-specific and to get a real grasp on compliance with IPCs, this construction needs to be explored in more depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.