Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28010246›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2017

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant Staphylococcus aureus α-toxoid and a recombinant Panton-Valentine leukocidin subunit, in healthy adults.

Michael L Landrum, Tahaniyat Lalani, Minoo Niknian, Jason D Maguire, Duane R Hospenthal, Ali Fattom, Kimberly Taylor, Jamie Fraser, Kenneth Wilkins, Michael W Ellis and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Toxins · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. New developments and future challenges in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of prosthetic joint infection.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Recent advances inInfection and drug resistance · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Michael L Landruma Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics , Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Rockville , MD , USA.
Tahaniyat Lalania Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics , Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Rockville , MD , USA.
Minoo Nikniane Nabi Biopharmaceuticals , Rockville , MD , USA.
Jason D Maguired Division of Infectious Diseases , Naval Medical Center Portsmouth , Portsmouth , VA , USA.
Duane R Hospenthalb Division of Infectious Diseases , San Antonio Military Medical Center , Fort Sam Houston , TX , USA.
Ali Fattome Nabi Biopharmaceuticals , Rockville , MD , USA.
Kimberly Taylore Nabi Biopharmaceuticals , Rockville , MD , USA.
Jamie Frasera Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics , Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Rockville , MD , USA.
Kenneth Wilkinsa Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics , Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Rockville , MD , USA.
Michael W Ellisf Infectious Diseases Division , University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences , Toledo , OH , USA.
Paul D Kesslere Nabi Biopharmaceuticals , Rockville , MD , USA.
Rafaat E F Fahime Nabi Biopharmaceuticals , Rockville , MD , USA.
David R Tribblea Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics , Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Rockville , MD , USA.
Henry M. Jackson Foundation · USNaval Medical Center Portsmouth · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USSan Antonio Military Medical Center · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

DATA CENTER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS OF HIVN01AI005072 · NIAID · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MCKINLAY, SONJA M · 1990 to 1994
–
NIAID NIH HHS Y01 AI005072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study in healthy adults to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of recombinant Staphylococcus aureus candidate vaccine antigens, recombinant α-toxoid (rAT) and a sub-unit of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (rLukS-PV). 176 subjects were enrolled and randomized within 1 of 11 treatment cohorts: monovalent rAT or rLukS-PV dosages of 10, 25, 50, and 100 μg; bivalent rAT:rLukS dosages of 10:10, 25:25, and 50:50 μg; and alum or saline placebo. All subjects were assessed at Days 0, 7, 14, 28, and 84. Subjects in the 50:50 μg bivalent cohort received a second injection on Day 84 and were assessed on Days 98 and 112. Incidence and severity of reactogenicity and adverse events (AEs) were compared. Geometric mean serum concentrations (GMC) and neutralizing activity of anti-rAT and anti-rLukS-PV IgG were assessed. Reactogenicity incidence was significantly higher in vaccine than placebo recipients (77% versus 55%, respectively; p = 0.006). However, 77% of reactogenicity events were mild and 19% were moderate in severity. The AE incidence and severity were similar between the cohorts. All monovalent and bivalent rAT dosages resulted in a significant increase in the anti-rAT IgG and anti- rLukS-PV GMCs between day 0 and 28 compared with placebo, and persisted through Day 84. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested a higher GMC and neutralizing antibody titers for the 50 μg monovalent or bivalent rAT and rLukS-PV dose as compared to the other doses. No booster effect was observed after administration of the second dose. We conclude that the rAT and rLukS-PV vaccine formulations were well-tolerated and had a favorable immunogenicity profile, producing antibody with neutralizing activity through day 84. There was no benefit observed with a booster dose of the vaccine.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdolescentAdultAlum CompoundsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingBacterial ToxinsDouble-Blind MethodDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsExotoxinsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHemolysin ProteinsHumansImmunoglobulin GLeukocidinsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAlum Compoundsaluminum sulfateAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingBacterial ToxinsExotoxinsHemolysin ProteinsImmunoglobulin GLeukocidinsPanton-Valentine leukocidinPlacebosstaphylococcal alpha-toxinStaphylococcal VaccinesToxoidsVaccines, Syntheticbacterial vaccinerecombinant Panton-Valentine leukocidinrecombinant α-toxoidStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID28010246
PMCPMC5404372
OpenAlexW2564600967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.