Predicting Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation: Trying to Catch It Early.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Outcomes of listing for lung and heart-lung transplantation in pulmonary hypertension: comparative experience in France and the UK.ERJ open research · 2024
   Article
2. A single-center experience of 1500 lung transplant patients.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Increased Extravascular Lung Water and Plasma Biomarkers of Acute Lung Injury Precede Oxygenation Impairment in Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation.2017

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as