Observational studyAnnals of surgery2017
Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Recurrence, Surgical Site Infection, and Quality of Life After Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh: The COBRA Study.
Observational study in Annals of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06197854 (Onlay Versus Sublay Hernioplasty in Management of Incisional Hernia), which is not on this map. Cited by 125 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Onlay Versus Sublay Hernioplasty in Management of Incisional Hernia
Who cites it
125 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Biosynthetic meshes in contaminated fields: where are we now? A systematic review and meta-analysis in humans.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of outcomes of ventral hernia repair using different meshes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Ventral hernia repair in high-risk patients and contaminated fields using a single mesh: proportional meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of mesh closure in preventing wound failure following emergency laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh in a contaminated field: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Measuring quality of life in patients with abdominal wall hernias: a systematic review of available tools.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Bioabsorbable mesh use in midline abdominal wall prophylaxis and repair achieving fascial closure: a cross-sectional review of stage of innovation.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Biologic vs Synthetic Mesh for Single-stage Repair of Contaminated Ventral Hernias: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA surgery · 2022Trial
- Quality of life following two different techniques of an open ventral hernia repair for large hernias: a prospective randomized study.BMC surgery · 2022Trial
- Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2020Trial
- The impact of component separation technique versus no component separation technique on complications and quality of life in the repair of large ventral hernias.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Trial
- Safety and efficacy of prophylactic resorbable biosynthetic mesh following midline laparotomy in clean/contemned field: preliminary results of a randomized double blind prospective trial.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020Trial
- Prospective evaluation of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh in CDC class I/high-risk ventral and incisional hernia repair: 18-month follow-up.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Trial
- Beyond the radiology report: a multi-criteria decision analysis to define essential CT parameters for abdominal wall reconstruction : STAMP-C framework for preoperative hernia imaging.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Long-Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Does (patient) size matter? the impact of body mass index on outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive transversus abdominis release.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Recurrent Parastomal Hernia Treated With Stoma Relocation and Abdominal Lipectomy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Article
- Bio-resorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction is effective in high-risk patients and contaminated abdomen.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Absorbable mesh is associated with a higher risk of recurrence and reoperation: a propensity score-matched comparison of mesh performance in clean and contaminated ventral hernia repairs.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study was to evaluate biosynthetic absorbable mesh in single-staged contaminated (Centers for Disease Control class II and III) ventral hernia (CVH) repair over 24 months.
backgroundCVH has an increased risk of postoperative infection. CVH repair with synthetic or biologic meshes has reported chronic biomaterial infections and high hernia recurrence rates.
methodsPatients with a contaminated or clean-contaminated operative field and a hernia defect at least 9 cm had a biosynthetic mesh (open, sublay, retrorectus, or intraperitoneal) repair with fascial closure (n = 104). Endpoints included overall Kaplan-Meier estimates for hernia recurrence and postoperative wound infection rates at 24 months, and the EQ-5D and Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12). Analyses were conducted on the intent-to-treat population, and health outcome measures evaluated using paired t tests.
resultsPatients had a mean age of 58 years, body mass index of 28 kg/m, 77% had contaminated wounds, and 84% completed 24-months follow-up. Concomitant procedures included fistula takedown (n = 24) or removal of infected previously placed mesh (n = 29). Hernia recurrence rate was 17% (n = 16). At the time of CVH repair, intraperitoneal placement of the biosynthetic mesh significantly increased the risk of recurrences (P ≤ 0.04). Surgical site infections (19/104) led to higher risk of recurrence (P < 0.01). Mean 24-month EQ-5D (index and visual analogue) and SF-12 physical component and mental scores improved from baseline (P < 0.05).
conclusionsIn this prospective longitudinal study, biosynthetic absorbable mesh showed efficacy in terms of long-term recurrence and quality of life for CVH repair patients and offers an alternative to biologic and permanent synthetic meshes in these complex situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.