Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28009633›Full record

ArticlePain2017

Use of Smartphones to Prospectively Evaluate Predictors and Outcomes of Caregiver Responses to Pain in Youth with Chronic Disease.

Mark Connelly, Maggie H Bromberg, Kelly K Anthony, Karen M Gil, Laura E Schanberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pediatric sickle cell pain-sleep relationships: The roles of positive and negative affect.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mark ConnellyDivision of Developmental and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Maggie H BrombergCenter for Child Health, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kelly K AnthonyDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Karen M GilDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Laura E SchanbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USSeattle Children's Hospital · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Electronic Diary Assessment of Pain in Juvenile ArthritisR01AR053845 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHANBERG, LAURA E · 2008 to 2010
$1.0M
Enhancing the CARRA: Integration and Dissemination of Clinical DataR01AR063890 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHANBERG, LAURA E · 2012 to 2013
$407k
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP006490NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR053845NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined outcomes and predictors of different types of responses to child pain used by caregivers of youth with chronic disease. Sixty-six children and adolescents (ages 7-18) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis answered questions about pain, pain interference in activities, and mood on a smartphone three times per day for one month, while a caregiver contemporaneously answered questions about their own mood and use of protecting, monitoring, minimizing, or distracting responses to their child's pain. Multilevel models were used to evaluate (a) how a child's pain and pain interference changes after a caregiver uses different types of pain responses; (b) the extent to which caregiver responses to pain vary across days; and (c) whether variability in caregiver responses to pain is predicted by changes in child pain characteristics, child mood, and/or caregiver mood. Results showed that children's pain intensity and pain interference increased following moments when caregivers used more protective responses, whereas children's pain interference decreased following times when caregivers responded with minimizing responses. Caregiver pain responses varied considerably across days, with caregivers responding with more protecting and monitoring responses and fewer minimizing responses at moments when their child reported high levels of pain unpleasantness and pain interference. Caregivers also were found to respond with fewer protective responses at moments when they themselves were in a more positive mood. Implications for clinical recommendations and future studies are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID28009633
PMCPMC5472500
OpenAlexW2567476478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.